top | item 36222486

(no title)

nixcraft | 2 years ago

Microsoft is very hostile toward its users. They added Ads in the paid version of the operating system. You can't uninstall Edge. Even if you remove Edge, which is difficult, the following Windows update will reinstall it. Instead of searching for the next big idea, how about you fix your dam OS first and stop installing stupid games and showing Ads? Keep it Microsoft with your stupid games, and Google has nothing to worry about you. LOL.

discuss

order

devinprater|2 years ago

Gosh yes. Even for blind users, now they're doing this awful thing where even the File Explorer context menu (shift + F10) is this weird preview of "options most people will need" where at the bottom there's a "view more" thing which opens the actual context menu, where my 7Zip, Dropbox, open in terminal, and stuff are. Ugh can't wait until either Linux is accessible enough for non-programmers and advanced users, or MacOS VoiceOver can work well enough with the web to work with Google Docs and Salesforce. Windows 11 is not the most accessible version of Windows yet, Microsoft, and wasn't built from the ground up to be accessible. Just look at this Kaiju dung!

https://blogs.windows.com/windowsexperience/2021/07/01/whats...

The speed of apps, lol. Yep, that's right. Move fast and break things.

vharuck|2 years ago

There's a fix for that, but it requires editing the registry: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/restor...

I'm so much happier after doing it. Hard to believe Microsoft thought it was a good move for user happiness. Sure, they should avoid intimidating users with no computer savvy, but I doubt those users often open the context menu.

happymellon|2 years ago

> Ugh can't wait until either Linux is accessible enough for non-programmers and advanced users

My 8 year old and 12 year old are both fine using Linux, so I wouldn't call them advanced or technical. What do you need it to do that you can't?

[Edit] Somehow I missed the blind part. I haven't tried those accessibility functions, though I would have thought that corporate customers would have required that so they don't get sued.

soco|2 years ago

Move slow and break things, in this case.

chongli|2 years ago

Instead of searching for the next big idea, how about you fix your dam OS first and stop installing stupid games and showing Ads?

They’re monetizing their install base. All of the things they do that annoy the heck out of people on HN are things they’ve A/B tested to increase revenues. If they listened to you then you’d be happier but they’d be leaving money on the table.

You’re probably right that this sort of “scorched earth” monetization at all costs is bad for the company’s long-term future. But the stock market doesn’t care about that. They only care about the next quarter.

FredPret|2 years ago

I think to win long-term in any market, it helps tremendously to win the hearts and minds of the “elite” users first. You see this in fashion, in cars, in tech, even in investments.

These top / early / elite consumers tell the rest what to buy. For example, the non-techies in my life use (MS) ChatGPT only because I told them about it and also told them it’s the next big thing.

I will also add that I think the majority of investment money is in the hands of long-term thinkers; a lot of this money is managed on behalf of others. It would behoove every CEO to make the power users happy over the long term.

rvba|2 years ago

The A/B testers optimize for local maximum... but dont realize global minimum.

People will just use the pirated version where all this crap is disabled.

pierat|2 years ago

Debian is *NOT* hostile towards its user base. And these days, that's worth more than its weight in gold.

But feel free to keep being the "old man yells at cloud". that cloud (microsoft) doesn't care.

pierat|2 years ago

To lmm (flagkilled post decrying systemd)

This youtube video has been featured here before, "The Tragedy of Systemd" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_AIw9bGogo and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19207533

Like the 1h long video goes into detail, I think that systemd is a definite step in the right direction, but definitely has bad aspects about it. To that end, I think work can be (and is being) done to remedy those deficiencies.

Now to compare "good intending but buggy software" to malicious (and guilty of monopolization exploitation) actions to further cement themselves in the lead is completely and utterly a laughable comparison.

lmm|2 years ago

[deleted]

29athrowaway|2 years ago

You can have a perfectly good Microsoft-free life in 2023.

But some people keep buying and using their products without bothering to look for alternatives.

drukenemo|2 years ago

Tell that to most companies. I have no option, but to work with Microsoft software at my work.

Inityx|2 years ago

Not if you play PC VR games :(

tmottabr|2 years ago

Google is just as hostile, if not more..

Google did the same thing in the early days of Chrome.. using search to heavily promote Chrome..

They went as far as making so everything else they did would not work correctly on other browsers artificially..

They would introduce random delays or flat out refuse to work in other browsers but all you had to do was change the browser user-agent to mimic Chrome and things would magically start working..

Sorry but i am not sorry at all for Google.. They both are no different from each other.. Just two companies trying to maximize the amount of money they make..

aaomidi|2 years ago

Honestly people who can, should ditch windows.

yndoendo|2 years ago

Often the anchor to Microsoft Windows is legacy. Both in existing code and existing knowledge. Takes energy to diverge away from both.

Currently maintain applications because the former developer only knew C#. Also the tools used to configure devices are only Windows based. This dramatically harms quality of the product in the long run and support.

My experience with product is design. Use the solution the fits the problem not the solution you currently know and rely on.

You have to pay me to engage with Microsoft / Windows!

Incipient|2 years ago

Have you tried uninstalling chrome from Android? I can't even uninstall "pixel tips" - an entirely unimportant "tips" app is mandatory?!

A browser I can understand with how common PWAs are these days.

justsomehnguy|2 years ago

You can't, though you can disable it, along with the most Google apps.

If you want a phone without "G.suite" that's way harder of course.

judge2020|2 years ago

Doesn't Edge on Windows work like Chrome does on Android, with it providing an API that other apps can use to render webpages in something other than Trident?

tmottabr|2 years ago

Yeah...

And before Edge it was IE..

IE was also impossible to remove backj in the days.. they did have an option uninstall but all it did was remove the icons from start menu, but all the files where still there..

At this day and age the browser is so deeply integrated into the OS that is not really possible to remove it without breaking things..

This is why you cant remove Edge from Windows, Chrome from Android and Safari from apple things.

Even in linux, Gnome has Epiphany (now Gnome WEB) and KDE has Konqueror..

tacticus|2 years ago

and yet the "are you sure you don't want edge" popup isn't requried in this use case.

combine that with the fact that their own apps will only open in edge in future versions makes it not like chrome on android.

anoy8888|2 years ago

Microsoft likes to play dirty . It is in their genes

flangola7|2 years ago

When was there ever a non paid version of Windows?

nunobrito|2 years ago

Up until Windows XP you'd see Microsoft turning a blind eye to pirate serial keys.

This worked marvels for non paid mass adoption back in the day.