top | item 36256805 (no title) user_account | 2 years ago With MicroPython you can have C drivers and just do the MicroPython bindings. I do not see the benefits of having yet another interpreted IoT language and it does not make sense to do the drivers in the interpreted language itself. discuss order hn newest Ins43b|2 years ago I think having a strongly typed language is a great reason to have another interpreted language for IoT/embedded. actionfromafar|2 years ago Typescript is more of "firmly" typed than strongly, in my not so humble opinion.I guess it's beats C for IoT, but with Typescript it still feels like the S in IoT stands for Security. load replies (1)
Ins43b|2 years ago I think having a strongly typed language is a great reason to have another interpreted language for IoT/embedded. actionfromafar|2 years ago Typescript is more of "firmly" typed than strongly, in my not so humble opinion.I guess it's beats C for IoT, but with Typescript it still feels like the S in IoT stands for Security. load replies (1)
actionfromafar|2 years ago Typescript is more of "firmly" typed than strongly, in my not so humble opinion.I guess it's beats C for IoT, but with Typescript it still feels like the S in IoT stands for Security. load replies (1)
Ins43b|2 years ago
actionfromafar|2 years ago
I guess it's beats C for IoT, but with Typescript it still feels like the S in IoT stands for Security.