This is obviously a neat project, and I'm excited to see it. But... I spent a couple of minutes scrolling through the summarised posts and my main takeaway was that it was extremely boring compared to the normal experience of reading HN. Instead of dipping in and out of content, finding interesting nuggets and jumping around between topics, this felt like listening to someone read out the football scores.
What I've been dreaming of is a "podcast" generated for a day of HN, but focusing on the comments and conversations.
I come here for the convos. But I also commute in a car, and I exercise with headphones.
I want like a radio show made of segments. Each segment is a post with the best conversations between users. Use a generative Ai voice service (like Coqui), and have it speak the comments aloud.
Then I can listen to interesting chatter through my headphones.
Interesting, but I find much more value from discussion rather than the article itself.
Would be interesting to see how much value I’d get from a ChatGPT summary of the discussion rather than/in addition to the article. I could see that being much less “sterile” as well.
I wrote a tampermonkey script(1) so you don't have to navigate away and it shows you summary and takeaways right inside hacker news (2) div boxes, but i was using kagi.com/v1/summarization for the api which is now dead.
But this is the perfect fit for it as I see you have created services for extraction and summarisation which can be easily self hosted and turned into apis.
This is very cool, I have worked on a similar project, but haven't managed to take the time to finish & launch it. Some food for thought:
I was interested in being able to scroll Hacker News but instead of opening the article open the summary. It would be as interesting to read a summary of the discussion below.
Ideally, it's possible to easily get to the real thing. This way you can decide what's interesting to dive into deeper and where it's good to get an idea of the TL;DR: even if it might not be accurate which is the next interesting point of contention that would be interesting to drill further down.
[+] [-] gnfargbl|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wfhBrian|2 years ago|reply
I made this little ChatGPT prompt for analyzing the comments[1][2].
But, I'm still here reading comments. I guess there are just some things AI can't replace... yet?
[1] video workflow of how I use the prompt on mobile https://twitter.com/wfhbrian/status/1663305398084837376?s=20
[2] share link for the prompt https://chat.openai.com/share/df861f21-5cf2-43e0-b519-a06781...
[+] [-] Solvency|2 years ago|reply
I come here for the convos. But I also commute in a car, and I exercise with headphones.
I want like a radio show made of segments. Each segment is a post with the best conversations between users. Use a generative Ai voice service (like Coqui), and have it speak the comments aloud.
Then I can listen to interesting chatter through my headphones.
[+] [-] hyferg|2 years ago|reply
https://pgpod.com/
You have to add articles yourself and it does not have any special logic for HN threads yet.
[+] [-] jonas-w|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Zetice|2 years ago|reply
Either way, very cool.
[+] [-] changxin|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hackernewds|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stingrae|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] changxin|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jader201|2 years ago|reply
Would be interesting to see how much value I’d get from a ChatGPT summary of the discussion rather than/in addition to the article. I could see that being much less “sterile” as well.
[+] [-] superasn|2 years ago|reply
But this is the perfect fit for it as I see you have created services for extraction and summarisation which can be easily self hosted and turned into apis.
(1) https://gist.github.com/san-kumar/b3604ca40905556b4135fee64e... (2) https://imgur.com/a/kRUkn6g
[+] [-] changxin|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] platzhirsch|2 years ago|reply
I was interested in being able to scroll Hacker News but instead of opening the article open the summary. It would be as interesting to read a summary of the discussion below.
Ideally, it's possible to easily get to the real thing. This way you can decide what's interesting to dive into deeper and where it's good to get an idea of the TL;DR: even if it might not be accurate which is the next interesting point of contention that would be interesting to drill further down.
[+] [-] changxin|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pknerd|2 years ago|reply
- there is no concept of "Sandbox" by OpenAI. - Trial period starts since the day I signed up on OpenAI rather than from the day I created my API Key.
[+] [-] bitshiftfaced|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] changxin|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eterps|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] changxin|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] amelius|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] iamflimflam1|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] private1215|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hall0ween|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] matzf|2 years ago|reply
> An imternet uses OpenAI (business model: "Uber for plagiarism") to help hacker news to incorrect eachother about a topic without having to read TFA.
[+] [-] robblbobbl|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bguberfain|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] changxin|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] meghan_rain|2 years ago|reply
thanks a lot!
imagine having this for other social media: "elon musk is trolling and a skater falls on a banana"
i would get so much time back
[+] [-] changxin|2 years ago|reply