top | item 36276102

(no title)

magicfractal | 2 years ago

He was free to chose his own pronouns and keep his gender ideology to himself. The company is also free to chose the policy that maximizes the well-being of most employees. Instead, he decided to engage in proselytizing at work, well deserved imo.

discuss

order

version_five|2 years ago

That's not how I read it. He was "pressured" or forced depending on how you interpret the article to play that game and couldn't leave it blank. So he lashed out a bit when provoked. At least he took a stand and didn't just capitulate and play that stupid game. I wouldn't say I agree with putting something inflammatory, but it's way more respectable that just letting something absurd get forced on you. I would have just quit. (Same as I would quit if I was asked to affirm I believed in the principles of any religion, as sometimes comes up).

locopati|2 years ago

Something absurd like asking someone how they want to be referred to in the third person?

DanBC|2 years ago

[deleted]

Nextgrid|2 years ago

If he was free to choose then "assigned by god" is just as valid as any other pronoun.

gdy|2 years ago

"the policy that maximizes the well-being of most employees"

Of most?