top | item 36277986

(no title)

forgotmysn | 2 years ago

he's literally doing exactly what the board wants. reddit's investors are more than happy to sacrifices users and the user experience for profitability.

discuss

order

hinkley|2 years ago

Doesn’t Reddit have a track record of getting the CEO to do something unpopular and then replacing them?

pcurve|2 years ago

Spez... then Yishan Wong... then Ellen Pao... Then Spez.

Not sure if I recall Wong or Pao did things that seemed overtly business / investor motivated? I know there was the controversial firing of Victoria Taylor by Pao that eventually led to her demise.

ramraj07|2 years ago

This is not the path to profitability. This is how you lose the mods and power users who provide and moderate the content of the site leading to it's downfall. That's not profitable.

yanderekko|2 years ago

Mods can be replaced. Do the actual valuable users rely heavily on Reddit's API or 3rd party apps? I doubt they'd leave over pure moral outrage on this issue, although a large amount of generic brand damage could cause some attrition.

seydor|2 years ago

Debateable whether any users will be sacrificed?

If anything this has given reddit more visibility, and more engagement within its website too. All publicity is good publicity

kiba|2 years ago

Until there are no users and reddit is a dead husk.

forgotmysn|2 years ago

agreed. but as long as the investors are to move their shares during the IPO before a complete exodus occurs, they are perfectly happy with that outcome.