top | item 36303576

(no title)

ericathegreat | 2 years ago

There's a huge difference between: - Don't use this, it's harmful to you, and - Don't use this, it won't make things actively better.

Study after study has shown that it is extremely, almost absurdly difficult to lose weight and keep it that way in the long term.

If "not actively causing long term weight loss" is the only criteria for advising against something, then we should be advising against a heck of a lot more things that are perfectly fine.

It's phrasing like this that causes people to go on crusades against random foods, rather than actually using moderation in all things.

discuss

order

danjin250|2 years ago

The article states reasons for its recommendations in addition to not being effective for long-term weight loss:

"WHO also noted that “potential undesirable effects from long-term use” of NSS, such as an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The results of the review also suggest that there may be other dangerous consequences such as the increased risk of premature death among adults."