top | item 36327069 (no title) joostdecock | 2 years ago Don't get me started discuss order hn newest zo1|2 years ago Shouldn't it be spelled "de Kok" if that's a surname? efdee|2 years ago De Kok, De Cock, De Kock, De Cok, ... All the same. Surname spelling was highly volatile before the French took over. load replies (1) oefnak|2 years ago No, because of Baantjer. load replies (1) LeifCarrotson|2 years ago [deleted] 8675309t|2 years ago Don't do this here. franky47|2 years ago I don't see the problem, it's a perfectly cromulent word. load replies (1)
zo1|2 years ago Shouldn't it be spelled "de Kok" if that's a surname? efdee|2 years ago De Kok, De Cock, De Kock, De Cok, ... All the same. Surname spelling was highly volatile before the French took over. load replies (1) oefnak|2 years ago No, because of Baantjer. load replies (1)
efdee|2 years ago De Kok, De Cock, De Kock, De Cok, ... All the same. Surname spelling was highly volatile before the French took over. load replies (1)
LeifCarrotson|2 years ago [deleted] 8675309t|2 years ago Don't do this here. franky47|2 years ago I don't see the problem, it's a perfectly cromulent word. load replies (1)
zo1|2 years ago
efdee|2 years ago
oefnak|2 years ago
LeifCarrotson|2 years ago
[deleted]
8675309t|2 years ago
franky47|2 years ago