(no title)
WisNorCan | 2 years ago
Neither one qualified for the illustrious FAANG acronym.
Ideally, when these things happen people would examine their blindspots.
WisNorCan | 2 years ago
Neither one qualified for the illustrious FAANG acronym.
Ideally, when these things happen people would examine their blindspots.
hsjqllzlfkf|2 years ago
MAANGO
0xr0kk3r|2 years ago
Put aside the online rags trying to grab eyeballs and look at investors. My RIA has been using Oracle in portfolios for decades: Oracle has been sitting quietly in my portfolio for over 25 years, just doing its thing being a solid stock and paying dividends. There are many other blue-chips out there that focus on providing a reliable product instead of being some sexy risky growth stock that grabs all the media attention.
nailer|2 years ago
heelix|2 years ago
The nature of Oracle is they are willing to evaluate if things are working or not. They build in house, they buy where they think they have a gap. The two units will be kept somewhat separate while they compete. Eventually there will be just one. To the outside world, it is a bit of a WTF on the overlapping product list. You see the same sort of competitive, aggressive nature with their Sales folks. Hunters, not farmers. What I don't see Oracle doing is pulling a Rooster.com. They likely will figure out the 'next big thing' by making sure there is a market for it, building internally and then buying up the talent that flew just a tad too close to the sun - and make something that gives a maintenance stream. When you see them doing it, you can bet it has hit the point where it will be profitable for them.
bluepizza|2 years ago
The world is big enough for both to exist.