top | item 36344931 (no title) detrites | 2 years ago Reduced without meaning loss:> Hackers exploit flawed proprietary code.(6w/45c -> 5w/40c) discuss order hn newest akomtu|2 years ago The first 3 words carry the same information as: hackers hacked hackable proprietary code. So just "proprietary code hacked" is enough. detrites|2 years ago Agreed. Further reduced:> Proprietary code hack.(6w/45c -> 3w/22c: >50%) load replies (2) evronm|2 years ago Goddamn! I thought I was anal about efficiency... BasedAnon|2 years ago You can get rid of 'flawed' since it's implicit in 'exploit' rcme|2 years ago The word exploit alone is ambiguous since it can also mean roughly “to use.” load replies (1) unknown|2 years ago [deleted]
akomtu|2 years ago The first 3 words carry the same information as: hackers hacked hackable proprietary code. So just "proprietary code hacked" is enough. detrites|2 years ago Agreed. Further reduced:> Proprietary code hack.(6w/45c -> 3w/22c: >50%) load replies (2)
detrites|2 years ago Agreed. Further reduced:> Proprietary code hack.(6w/45c -> 3w/22c: >50%) load replies (2)
BasedAnon|2 years ago You can get rid of 'flawed' since it's implicit in 'exploit' rcme|2 years ago The word exploit alone is ambiguous since it can also mean roughly “to use.” load replies (1)
rcme|2 years ago The word exploit alone is ambiguous since it can also mean roughly “to use.” load replies (1)
akomtu|2 years ago
detrites|2 years ago
> Proprietary code hack.
(6w/45c -> 3w/22c: >50%)
evronm|2 years ago
BasedAnon|2 years ago
rcme|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]