Heh, reminds me of the early 90s, when I was making my first attempts at complete videogames. I fell in love with the Lucasfilm games, specifically Monkey Island, so I started to build my own graphic adventure engine.
I wanted to have the same look, and I naively thought the same fonts would be important (and conveniently ignored the question of how to make high quality art, since I suck as an artist). So I got some graph paper and copied the two fonts by hand, pixel by pixel, off the screen -- the bold font with an outline used for dialogue, and the skinnier font used for the UI.
I never finished that graphic adventure (mainly due to not really having a plot, not due to technical difficulties), but the fonts looked pretty convincing! I think I still have that graph paper with the fonts in some box in the basement.
The actual physical display here is great too. Certainly the London ones a key part of the aesthetic is the orange LEDs. How is the brightness and power consumption?
The London Underground Regular font struck me as quite peculiar when I encountered it on a trip a few years back. The decision to lower the baseline for uppercase letters is highly nonstandard – I’m not aware of any other Latin-based digital signage system in the world that does that.
I wonder if it was the result of a study that concluded visibility was slightly increased over a consistent baseline due to the extra pixel of height for caps. Whatever the reason, it certainly gives the signs a quirky character (no pun intended).
Was wondering the same thing. If you look at some of the station displays pictured, you can see that there‘s not much space between lines, so I assume this is to have space for descenders without clashing with the lines below (more like raising the baseline for non-capital letters).
It makes the capitals stand out more and I imagine it could be helpful for visitors who may have trouble remembering long sequences of Latin characters and may pictorially memorize the capital letters instead.
I might be feeling particularly cynical but I don’t get the feeling these were based off any study.
Anyway, it works ok for most of the characters but it’s quite jarring for the Ki because it looks like the K descends into the i’s cell (though it doesn’t).
it also greatly increases the visibility / contrast for ALL-CAPS which looks to be quite common in these signs. while allowing for the qgyj letters that descend one pixel below baseline
Lol it's like each character was developed in a vacuum and someone forget to tell the W creator there was a width limit until too late. Maybe an allegory to modern corporate software development there...
I always wondered what tech/programming was behind the notification boards on trains and in train stations. Do each station custom build their own solution, or is there a company who provides this to TFL/UK stations?
There's a couple of pubs in London (specifically close to underground stations) which have a notification boards above the bar for the next trains coming in and peering behind the notification display I see a Raspberry Pi dangling...
I think the companies providing railway signalling systems, like Thales, Alstom, Hitachi, Siemens, Westinghouse, would be most likely to supply this sort of system — or more likely, supply the system behind it but outsource the displays.
Actual on-station signage will mostly be from a set of standard parts from railway suppliers.
https://wiki.openraildata.com/ has information about various open data feeds available for the railways in Great Britain, and https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/open-data-users/ for TfL. Third party solutions for things like railway adjacent bars presumably use one of these to get departures board info etc.
For "London Underground Medium", it's almost certain this technology is character based (it's not archaic enough to be hand-crafted values) and so somebody with even test access to a 1996 stock (ie Jubilee Line trains) can presumably tell one to display notices with the desired characters: F K Qq U V X Y Z and take a photo without it ever being in service.
On the other hand, the 1995 stock is very similar, same vendor, same era, likely identical display panels so I'd expect you could collect some of this data (e.g. London Zoo is accessed via the Northern Line, and that's a Z right there if the display mentions this) from those trains and assume it's the same.
I backed the British Rail Corporate Identity Manual project on Kickstarter. It's a wonderful book. My copies were slightly damaged in transit and they were replaced. I still have the 3 slightly damaged ones (dings on the cover, mostly) and if anyone wants them you can have them for the price of postage from the US. Ping me at the email in my bio.
There is something vaguely solipsistic about this project—the creator apparently didn't try to contact TfL to ask if the designer of these displays was still around. Meanwhile Tfl put a lot of effort into memorializing their typographic tradition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIAxVW-9fRo
Without meaning to sneer, I can't help noticing this project represents a really trivial engagement with typography (dot matrix characters are really simply to copy). There's no craft involved, obviously, and not necessarily any taste either. Typography and graphic design in general are full of those things. Maybe the designers of the signage would have been able to shed some light on those aspects...
What exactly were you expecting, a thesis project or documentary or something? As far as I can tell, petykowski just wanted to recreate the typefaces used on the Underground's digital signage. That's fine. Not everything has to be some magnum opus.
I'm speaking as a graphic designer who's been obsessed with typography for decades. Craft and taste are qualities I ordinarily pay a lot of attention to, and if petykowski had talked to anyone affiliated with these typefaces, I'm sure it would have been fascinating. But it's also important to remember that these faces are not in the same category as a high-end serif or something. They serve a bluntly functional purpose. The medium for which they're designed is entirely different. Of course they're simple and easy to copy; that's the point.
So I'm not sure how you are defining "craft" or "taste" here. These designs are crisp and legible. Your comment feels a little like somebody looking at an icon of Clarus the Dogcow (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogcow) and saying "Ah, but where's the dimensionality? Where's the realism? Can this truly be considered a rendering of an animal? How lazy."
I personally love pixel/dot-matrix typefaces. I hadn't known about this project, so I'm grateful that somebody went to the trouble of doing this.
What is the point of this reply? This is a set of font files, not an oral history project. The creator is not claiming that this is evidence of their craft or taste.
I think those are all of Stockholm's subway, station Hötorget and the Central Station. The director Jonas Åkerlund likes to sneak in images of his home town. He also used a clip from a game show on Swedish TV without permission.
I wouldn't be surprised if the font is unique to the London Underground.
At least the first display's font is fairly distinct, I haven't noticed it elsewhere. The bottom of the capital letters is a pixel lower than the lowercase letters.
[+] [-] ggambetta|2 years ago|reply
I wanted to have the same look, and I naively thought the same fonts would be important (and conveniently ignored the question of how to make high quality art, since I suck as an artist). So I got some graph paper and copied the two fonts by hand, pixel by pixel, off the screen -- the bold font with an outline used for dialogue, and the skinnier font used for the UI.
I never finished that graphic adventure (mainly due to not really having a plot, not due to technical difficulties), but the fonts looked pretty convincing! I think I still have that graph paper with the fonts in some box in the basement.
PS: OMG, I found an actual screenshot! https://gabrielgambetta.com/files/ne2.png Please enjoy my terrible 3D Studio skills and even wrose pixel art skills XD
[+] [-] sschueller|2 years ago|reply
https://sschueller.github.io/posts/vbz-fahrgastinformation/#...
[+] [-] fidotron|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unwind|2 years ago|reply
I'm not a native speaker of English, but pretty sure that the word "tic" [sic] is not what you want. Look into apostrophes [1].
[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%27_(disambiguation)
[+] [-] netsharc|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mortenjorck|2 years ago|reply
I wonder if it was the result of a study that concluded visibility was slightly increased over a consistent baseline due to the extra pixel of height for caps. Whatever the reason, it certainly gives the signs a quirky character (no pun intended).
[+] [-] phireal|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bschne|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] throwaheyy|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ComputerGuru|2 years ago|reply
Anyway, it works ok for most of the characters but it’s quite jarring for the Ki because it looks like the K descends into the i’s cell (though it doesn’t).
[+] [-] Gordonjcp|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] inconceivable|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] throw0101a|2 years ago|reply
* https://www.youtube.com/@geofftech2/videos
A few years ago, he and his girlfriend/partner (Vicki) visited all (then) 2,563 railway stations in England, Wales, and Scotland:
* http://allthestations.co.uk
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_the_Stations
* https://www.youtube.com/c/allthestations
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16461196
[+] [-] adrianmsmith|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mortenjorck|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] qbasic_forever|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jjgreen|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gareve|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] autonomousErwin|2 years ago|reply
There's a couple of pubs in London (specifically close to underground stations) which have a notification boards above the bar for the next trains coming in and peering behind the notification display I see a Raspberry Pi dangling...
[+] [-] Symbiote|2 years ago|reply
Here's the company that manufactured the ones for National Rail: https://trueform.com/products/next-train-indicator-nti/
[+] [-] fredoralive|2 years ago|reply
https://wiki.openraildata.com/ has information about various open data feeds available for the railways in Great Britain, and https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/open-data-users/ for TfL. Third party solutions for things like railway adjacent bars presumably use one of these to get departures board info etc.
[+] [-] tialaramex|2 years ago|reply
On the other hand, the 1995 stock is very similar, same vendor, same era, likely identical display panels so I'd expect you could collect some of this data (e.g. London Zoo is accessed via the Northern Line, and that's a Z right there if the display mentions this) from those trains and assume it's the same.
[+] [-] Symbiote|2 years ago|reply
U might show as "London Underground" at some point.
Does V show in "Change for the Victoria Line"? I can't remember if these trains show that.
[+] [-] JulesRosser|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] quickthrower2|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Symbiote|2 years ago|reply
P56 has what looks like the same font for London Overground: https://content.tfl.gov.uk/overground-signs-standard.pdf
And P47 for the DLR: https://content.tfl.gov.uk/dlr-signs-standard.pdf
[+] [-] qingcharles|2 years ago|reply
https://britishrailmanual.com/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Corporate_Identit...
[+] [-] encyclic|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] riverdweller|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stevedh|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] signalToNose|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sdsrgdrtgh|2 years ago|reply
Without meaning to sneer, I can't help noticing this project represents a really trivial engagement with typography (dot matrix characters are really simply to copy). There's no craft involved, obviously, and not necessarily any taste either. Typography and graphic design in general are full of those things. Maybe the designers of the signage would have been able to shed some light on those aspects...
[+] [-] _zzaw|2 years ago|reply
I'm speaking as a graphic designer who's been obsessed with typography for decades. Craft and taste are qualities I ordinarily pay a lot of attention to, and if petykowski had talked to anyone affiliated with these typefaces, I'm sure it would have been fascinating. But it's also important to remember that these faces are not in the same category as a high-end serif or something. They serve a bluntly functional purpose. The medium for which they're designed is entirely different. Of course they're simple and easy to copy; that's the point.
So I'm not sure how you are defining "craft" or "taste" here. These designs are crisp and legible. Your comment feels a little like somebody looking at an icon of Clarus the Dogcow (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogcow) and saying "Ah, but where's the dimensionality? Where's the realism? Can this truly be considered a rendering of an animal? How lazy."
I personally love pixel/dot-matrix typefaces. I hadn't known about this project, so I'm grateful that somebody went to the trouble of doing this.
[+] [-] ryanf|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vr46|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Jaxan|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] agumonkey|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] signalToNose|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Findecanor|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lying4fun|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] srboyd|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] IIAOPSW|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Symbiote|2 years ago|reply
At least the first display's font is fairly distinct, I haven't noticed it elsewhere. The bottom of the capital letters is a pixel lower than the lowercase letters.
Printed signs from Transport for London use Johnston Sans, noticeable with the diamond-shape dots on "i" and "j": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnston_(typeface)