top | item 3638512

My Algorithm for Beating Procrastination

101 points| phreeza | 14 years ago |lesswrong.com | reply

24 comments

order
[+] insertnickname|14 years ago|reply
My algorithm for beating procrastination: Stop reading about how to beat procrastination and do what you're supposed to do.
[+] vanni|14 years ago|reply
> Motivation = (Expectancy x Value) / (Impulsiveness x Delay)

Interesting approach to procrastination analysis. I'm happy to see that what I am building goes in the right direction to increase motivation: asaclock (http://www.asaclock.com) is an anti-procrastination web community for startup single founders and people working on side projects.

[+] no_gravity|14 years ago|reply
You announced this project months ago and it is still "coming soon"...
[+] insertnickname|14 years ago|reply
It is especially interesting because doing the calculation itself is procrastination.
[+] muyuu|14 years ago|reply
Placeholder so I can check it out later ;)
[+] jonnathanson|14 years ago|reply
The problem, as you've touched upon, is adjusting the dials between size-of-reward (S) and time-to-payout (T). S and T are, typically, inversely correlated. So we're forced to make a series of compromises in the scale of our goals in order to make them realistic.

I've found that, while there's no great way to "solve" this problem, there are systems you can use to manage it. Such as breaking down a larger task into increments. Incrementality is about viewing a larger task as the sum of a series of smaller tasks -- thereby allowing you to encounter a payout on a regular basis, rather than going exceedingly long stretches without one.

Procrastination is really a T problem, not an S problem. Hence, why incrementality really works. (Conversely, increasing S doesn't yield linearly adjusting motivation sufficient to overcome procrastination).

[+] LefterisJP|14 years ago|reply
But isn't technically following the multiple step method proposed by the OP not procrastinating in itself? :P I mean if I am procrastinating I would definitely not be in a state to get into a mentality to follow the method since I would be wasting my time in some other non-constructive manner ^^
[+] stfu|14 years ago|reply
I needed to speak Greek, Latin, French, or German, and German philosophy isn't quite as universally bad as the others

While I am myself not quite sure if philosophies can be at all qualified as good or bad, I am quite surprised to discover that the author apparently found a way to qualify the philosophies of whole countries and all their historic evolution as good or bad. Statements like these somewhat undermine otherwise interesting ideas.

[+] argonz|14 years ago|reply
Ohh just what the fuck is this. As we could not have statements about sets of simply anything.
[+] gfodor|14 years ago|reply
Putting together IKEA furniture is boring. Truly a first world problem if there ever was one.
[+] pbhjpbhj|14 years ago|reply
I find it quite interesting.

Once had to put together about 30 chairs. Followed their instructions for the first one. The instructions were terrible, they made it very difficult. Actually found it quite fun optimising the method to eventually do each chair in only a couple of minutes: made me think that the person writing their instructions couldn't have ever done it for themselves more than a couple of times ...

[+] officemonkey|14 years ago|reply
I _love_ putting together IKEA furniture. I just hate schlepping it in from the store.
[+] Drbble|14 years ago|reply
What about the problem of "I don't know how to do it"?
[+] indypb|14 years ago|reply
awake: programming

tired: doing something else

[+] epscylonb|14 years ago|reply
My problem is that I am often tired when I get home from work, not that I am procrastinating as such.

But there are a ton of things I would like to do, anyone got an algorithm for beating tiredness?.