[saiojd]

That's strange, what's the motivation behind not allowing destructuring? Seems very prudish.

[masklinn]

It's ambiguous. Are you disposing of the object being destructured or the destructuring results? How do you make the distinction?

Much easier to not do it.

[wruza]

Not sure if this would produce more issues, but they could ignore c# and use something like:

  const using x = getX()
  const {using prop1, prop2} = using getX()
  void using getX()
  // x, prop1 and 2 anonymous Xs to dispose

Instead of giving `using` the power / the burden of variable creation. This also solves `using mutex.lock()` mentioned elsewhere itt.

[saiojd]

To me it seems like disposing of the object being destructured is the natural solution. But I can see where others will disagree.