top | item 36399620

Removed as moderator of /r/Celebrities after over 14 years

219 points| graeme | 2 years ago |old.reddit.com

166 comments

order
[+] leoedin|2 years ago|reply
It's interesting seeing this situation play out across different subreddits. There seems to be 2 kinds of subreddits - the "category" kind (simple, descriptive name) and the "community" kind (have a defined purpose, could exist under a whole range of names)

The moderators of all of them see themselves as somehow owning the community, but I think that's less clear to the users. To most users, r/Celebrities is a category of posts about celebrities. They don't really care who moderates it. It's a similar situation for things like region/city specific subreddits. The users don't really care about the culture, they just want someone to delete the spam. When the moderators start shutting it down, or threatening to move the community elsewhere, the users mostly end up thinking "who elected you anyway?"

The community subreddits are different - they often have a much more defined culture and purpose. Those are the ones which, if the moderators give up, will die. It seems like Reddit is betting that most subreddits are the category kind - and they're probably right. But the community subreddits are likely to be lost.

[+] bgro|2 years ago|reply
reddit has some of the worst mods I’ve ever seen in any capacity. And they’re frequently in control of massive subreddits.

I remember when hate speech was just discovered as a reason to ban people, and mods of major subreddits would find ways to use that either out of protest or complete incompetence to ban people. For example, banning users for disagreeing with a controversial decision because “I hate your take, thus it is hate speech.”

Or the constant other entitled drama like when a soccer subreddit started mass banning people discussing a major game because his team lost.

There’s also just constant nuking of entire threads and locking them with no reason other than a blanket accusatory pinned comment about how “everybody” can’t behave. Nothing better than opening a thread about a picture they took of their dog only to find thousands of deleted comments and a temper tantrum post from some mod. Or multiple pinned spam posts from mods advertising junk in like a 5000 character copy paste spam in every post that just adds to the useless scrolling you have to do to see legitimate content.

[+] johnnyanmac|2 years ago|reply
>The users don't really care about the culture, they just want someone to delete the spam

for larger subs, I think users underestimate how much trouble it is to do that job. And Reddit hasn't made it easier for mods to do that. On the contrary, this move will make it more time consuming to delete spam.

[+] gonehome|2 years ago|reply
Getting rid of mods like the one linked in this post is a net positive for Reddit imo. His plan was to disable the subreddit for 6 weeks while working on a bot? What? Reddit can just take over.

Mods like this are awful - way too much power has gone to their head just because they happened to be the first to create some subreddit.

[+] veave|2 years ago|reply
>The community subreddits are different - they often have a much more defined culture and purpose. Those are the ones which, if the moderators give up, will die.

I am in some "community" subreddits and moderators are just there to enforce the rules that they made up and not everybody necessarily agree with. As an example, it's very common to have vague rules that silence some flavour of on-topic conversations... and then they are arbitrarily enforced, depending on whether the mod likes or dislikes where the conversation is going.

In my opinion, if mods from small subs were gone, that would be a huge positive. I'm glad that this abusive relationship of mods who think they own the entire community (including the users) and treat it as their fiefdom is coming to an end. Just the fact that they are shutting down entire communities shows the level of entitlement they have over the community they moderate. Doing a lot of unpaid labour doesn't entitle you to anything, but it does indeed show the kind of person that you are.

[+] pimterry|2 years ago|reply
Interestingly, each hit of Reddit drama like this does seem to be genuinely driving real migrations elsewhere - the ex-mod's corresponding post about this on KBin (https://kbin.social/m/RedditMigration/t/59559/Removed-as-mod...) now has more votes than this Reddit post, despite it being #1 in the obviously topical ModCoord subreddit, and on the front page of HN.

Not a perfect comparison in any sense obviously, and this doesn't refute any of the limitations & issues with Lemmy/KBin, but there is real traffic starting to move over there regardless.

[+] willvarfar|2 years ago|reply
Does enough users attention migrate to alternatives so those alternatives can build the minimum critical mass to survive longer term?
[+] sangnoir|2 years ago|reply
Reddit admin:mod ratio is 1:N, the fediverse changes that to M:N. Between that and the funding model (or lack of one), I'm curious to discover the many failure modes that will occur in the coming months. I suspect instance owners (who pay the bills from personal funds) will be even less willing to "negotiate" than the current Reddit leadership.

I'm a big fan of decentralization, but the naivete of Fedi-zealots and the lack of tooling/standards is shocking to me. The Fediverse needs machine-readable equivalent of Subreddit rules, and which instances are (de)federated. The clients need to surface this info in an easy-to-use UI, and will massively help with automation, there current levels of human-moderation cannot scale; though there are plenty of gatekeepers who don't want to scale.

[+] drumhead|2 years ago|reply
So they just expelled one of the people that helped make Reddit what it is today? No loyalty at all is there.
[+] tgv|2 years ago|reply
Money trumps loyalty (family, friendship). "We thank you for your service." It's unpleasant, but completely in line with what's happened to the internet over the last 20+ years. It has to look good for the IPO. The ones with the shares don't care what happens after that.
[+] powera|2 years ago|reply
I am more inclined to believe this is "a cabal of toxic moderators have revealed what they are, and Reddit is rightly removing them from the project".

When loyalty is a facade to keep malevolent people in power, it is no virtue.

[+] ChatGTP|2 years ago|reply
The CEO of Reddit watched an interview with Elon Musk and decided that it was time to cut back on staff to save money? \s
[+] graeme|2 years ago|reply
Subreddit was shut down while mod team worked on an anti-CSAM bot to help moderate after reddit announced the shutdown of existing tools.

Imagine there’s a bit more to the story: tools only shut down June 30th. But still notable. Shutdown obviously hurting Reddit still if they’re resorting to such measures and taking such risks.

[+] Zetobal|2 years ago|reply
there are mod tools that deleted their api keys in protest last week.
[+] poulpy123|2 years ago|reply
I don't even understand why they continue to work from free for people that do not even have the beginning of a care for them
[+] johnnyanmac|2 years ago|reply
I don't want to call it a cult, but there's a lot of stuff people will do, even to their objective personal cost, if it lets them benefit from a social perspective (be it real social value or perceived).

No one becomes a community manager because it pays well.

[+] faeriechangling|2 years ago|reply
When I actively moderated Reddit I was long term unemployed and considered it community service (aware that Reddit is privately owned) and tried to organize information (faq/sticky/tags/sidebar/etc) and moderate to create something useful and helpful to the general public.

Looking back though, it’s odd to me how much I could personally benefit myself at this point if I abused moderation powers for self-promotion because of the sheer reach that Reddit has and the extraordinary powers Mods have. But that was never the intention.

[+] throwaway71271|2 years ago|reply
wealth fame power? (or they just find joy in being of service to others)
[+] toadi|2 years ago|reply
Thank god this is happening. It cut down my reddit time and replaced it with actually doing some work.
[+] altairprime|2 years ago|reply
The moderator’s supposed post at Lemmy has more details and replies from them, and indicates that they were expecting this outcome eventually:

https://lemmy.world/post/316878

> Edit 2: I’ll also add, that I was never going to re-open the sub because I knew Reddit wasn’t going to yield. Thus, I was prepared for the outcome. I did hope to string them along for a bit longer and waste resources, but you can’t win them all.

[+] oneTbrain23|2 years ago|reply
Mod has too much power. Give paying reddit user to have ability to vote out Mod. It is a public commercial space not a US constitutions. If I pay, then I should have power to demote Mod. Yes, this swing to those that can pay. But that is life. If you are dirt poor, living in the middle of deserts far from any voting booth, do you think you can vote even if you have rights to do so? Or, you slender anyone you like on the pretext of #1 do you think you get away scot free if you are dirt poor? Or how about #2? You can own guns, bullets and even trained like John Wick if you are dirt poor? Then how come being a Mod even if you are dirt poor get to have so much power over a squated reddit namespace you dont own or even pay anything.
[+] EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK|2 years ago|reply
Isn't it a good idea generally to remove someone in power position after certain amount of time, regardless of how good or bad they are? There is a reason Nature made everyone mortal.
[+] bottlepalm|2 years ago|reply
What's with the mostly nsfw content? Was that part of the r/celebrities protest?
[+] Quarrel|2 years ago|reply
It is part of a campaign based on the fact that Reddit doesn't run ads against NSFW content, so high user count subs can mark everything NSFW (whether it is or not) and hurt Reddit in their cashflow.

For some of the subreddits this isn't as far fetched as for others; /r/videos is more of a work to rule to protest given they're now taking swearing very seriously. You have to think of the 14 year old kids that use reddit.

[+] testmasterflex|2 years ago|reply
Yes together with manipulating images to include the face of John Oliver
[+] seydor|2 years ago|reply
Interesting pathetic response from the moderator immediately bringing up child porn as an excuse. I am beginning to think reddit moderation is some sort of destructive addiction

More reddit entertainment is available in the comments on these news from the subreddit's users

https://www.reddit.com/r/celebrities/comments/14e2c48/the_he...

[+] sharikous|2 years ago|reply
This may be the place to talk about alternatives to reddit since discourse about that is banned there.

So far I've heard only about Lemmy. Are there others sites redditors reading this could be redirected to?

[+] neurostimulant|2 years ago|reply
Lemmy, kbin and mastodon instances can interact with each other via activitypub. People can migrate to literally any instance they want, then subscribe to any community they want regardless their origin instance.

My mind was blown the first time I watch this this interoperability happen. If twitter, reddit and hackernews support activitypub, it would goes like this: if someone post a tweet on twitter that mention a subreddit in the tweet, then that tweet is automatically visible in the mentioned subreddit as a post. The people on that subreddit can comment on the post, and it'll show up in the original author's tweet as reply to the tweet. Then in the middle of it, hackernews user somehow join the discussion because someone on the hackernews subscribe to the subreddit.

[+] previnder|2 years ago|reply
I launched an alternative a few days ago you may want to check out: https://discuit.net/. We're still in the very early stages, however.
[+] seydor|2 years ago|reply
The alternatives to subreddits are other subreddits
[+] shyn3|2 years ago|reply
Just found this

Https communities dot win

[+] kthejoker2|2 years ago|reply
Sidebar:

Is there even value in 2023 in having a "subreddit" called /r/Celebrities ? (Or funny, pics, sports, all ... )

It feels like there should be a natural "cap" to a sub's "TAM" or a 100% conversion from catgeory to community subreddits, to limit the blast radius of spam, scams, etc and create clearer rules of engagement for the good faith participants.

Or maybe /r/Celebrities could just be a no-comment curation of top posts of actual celebrity subreddits, with a paid Redditor at the top.

Anyway just weird to me.

[+] lusus_naturae|2 years ago|reply
Why can't mods be completely replaced by AI or bots? I wonder if a GPT-enabled AI mod would be better at serving mods functions. At the very least, it makes sense for the Reddit suits to try.

Community subreddits are better off as cozy internet forums anyways, they don't need Reddit and vice versa.

[+] gandalfgreybeer|2 years ago|reply
I’m a moderator of a fairly good sized sub (3M) and bots help flag things early but sometimes it takes nuance to determine if it’s something that needs action, especially if it’s for a very specific community.

There are rules that have been set up through time by mods that facilitate discussion and avoid people karma farming.

Lastly, there are also communities (one of them ours) that host AMAs or other community events and it’s us who approach people to see if they want to interact with the community.

I’m not saying mods are perfect (I myself am annoyed at ones from other subreddits and sometimes disagree with fellow ones) but mods aren’t there just to ban people and remove posts.

What makes HN amazing for me is how people hear moderate discussions and that’s one thing I’m trying to emulate.

[+] LatteLazy|2 years ago|reply
There are a bunch of natural human behaviours that because of the way society operates one has to suppress. You cannot hit people just because you are angry. You will have to move to pursue a better life and that means losing friends (even if you don't they will). One newer one is that if you spend time building someone else's product, that doesn't change the fact it is NOT yours. They can and will take it away the minute it suits them. So either don't do it or do it and know you will never be compensated, appreciated etc.
[+] jwmoz|2 years ago|reply
Probably a good thing.
[+] mvdtnz|2 years ago|reply

[deleted]

[+] cr3ative|2 years ago|reply
> a segment of their website? It's not yours. It never was.

That's really not been the ethos advertised to moderators until now; it was more that unless you caused site instability (legal or otherwise) it was yours to run as you please.

You may be speaking a literal truth, but the emotive background is relevant here.

[+] lou1306|2 years ago|reply
At the same time, Reddit entirely depends on these people to keep these segments of website safe and decent (not to mention ad-friendly). And these people depended on efficient 3rd party tools to carry out this form of free labor.

It is a much more delicate balance of power than what is found on most other social platforms. Some described (aptly in my view) this status quo as more akin to feudalism than to a nation state. Yeah the "land" may belong to you, but being nice to your stewards goes a long way if you want your head to remain attached to your neck.

[+] rospaya|2 years ago|reply
And at the same time, reddit has the balls to advertise itself as s great place to build a community for your product or company. How can anyone trust them not to take over your community when they feel like it?
[+] yanderekko|2 years ago|reply
Yeah, the dude politely asked for 4-6 weeks of closure time.. hard to believe that he expected Reddit to find this reasonable. Unfortunately, the admins probably lack bandwidth to go back and forth on these things and so they just yeeted the top mod rather than tell him that's unacceptable.