Wow, this is the worst possible situation, if true. They're likely to run out of breathable air long before they can be rescued. I'm hoping they make it out but, I personally would have opted for an implosion if I was in the same situation. The suffering they're enduring, if actually alive, is pretty rare.
I can't imagine what is potentially going through their heads. If they are alive the 8 hour delay from Oceangate on reporting the incident to the USCG is likely going to result in massive liability, possibly criminal. Deep Sea rescues are extremely improbable and minutes matter let alone hours.
I have a hard time believing that this report is accurate but, it's possible. My best friend works at the lab that tests and certifies deep sea vessels for the navy, manned and unmanned, and he's 99% sure they're already gone due to an implosion. He actually was involved in the testing of one of their prototypes so has a pretty intimate knowledge of their construction. Cyclical fatigue on the carbon fiber hull is the likely culprit if such was their fate.
Being in an enclosed space, knowing no one else can hear you, surrounded by people probably having a panic attack, at the bottom of the ocean in total darkness while you are slowly noticing the air getting harder and harder to breathe… yeah I would’ve taken the hull imploding over 80-something hours of that.
One guy is down there with his 19yo son… empathy is a powerful thing, imagining that situation just makes my heart sink.
Isn't it just a relatively doable matter, of hooking up a wire by a robot and pulling out to the surface, assuming a suitable robot can be flown and deployed soon enough?
I don't think anyone can actually take the company to court, the passengers signed their lives away (pardon the pun), to be able to take that ride to the Titanic.
I would be curious to know if it had a backup propulsion system in case the primary failed?
This makes me think of the search for the USS Thresher, a US Navy submarine. After the sub sank, the Seawolf was one of the Navy ships that went looking for it. Sonar operators on the Seawolf heard what they thought were manually operated SOS signals, banging of metal on metal, and eventually something resembling a voice. While these reports have started some conspiracy theories, the sonar readings from the initial sinking and wreckage indicates the Thresher imploded near instantly at depth, which would be unsurvivable for any amount of time.
Honestly the chance of anyone being alive in the Titan is about as close to zero as you get; these rescuers want so badly to save them that they're hearing what they want to.
What is it about this type of story that is so attention grabbing? Kids trapped in cave, Plane missing in jungle, etc etc. Is there a name for this?
Pragmatically speaking, this is of little consequence to most people, there are greater human tragedies going on, there are more catastrophic engineering failures happening, more egregious negligence,.. something about the unknown element of it.
>What is it about this type of story that is so attention grabbing?
In this particular story: Those guys are pioneers, they are doing something almost nobody has done before, like going deep down 4 kilometres under the surface of the ocean.
This takes guts. And people admire those that have the guts. It is primal instinct, as the people that take risks and survive usually makes the tribe or society improve.
Things that are routine today like planes flying without crashing down or reusable rockets or going to the moon were at some time extremely risky.
I think it's the possibility they are still alive and trapped, and might die like there after multiple days of multiple kinds of suffering.
Plus, being unable to call for help is not something we are used to. To me, just BEING somewhere where I could not contact anyone and nobody could get to me in an emergency sounds terrifying even if nothing was actively happening.
Plus, to laymen it seems like the tech to prevent it should be absolutely trivial in the age of satellites. If I was lost somewhere all because I didn't have a $200 beacon device I would be horrified, and these people paid $250k. I'd expect multiple redundant forms of communication, immediately surfacing with a refund if there was any sign of trouble, etc.
Isn't that like basic story telling? Someone goes on an adventure, then a catastrophe happens and now we are at the most thrilling part: will they make it out alive? And this is a real story, playing out in real time.
I think a lot of it is schadenfreude. A bunch of rich people pay out their ass to get in a jerryrigged submarine to look at a sunken boat and end up becoming one.
I wonder why the submersible was not equipped with redundant "self surface" systems. I imagine the overall density of this submersible to be close to that of water. Such that dropping some amount of ballast (like the metallic rails underneath) may lighten it enough to self-surface. In addition, some emergency "baloons" may be fitted, inflatable in an emergency by CO2 capsules to resurface. And an emergency system to open the sub (e.g. by blowing up a hole somewhere convenient) could be added as well to allow exit once at surface.
It is. It has electromagnetic drop weights that are meant to detach on power failure.
Thing is, when it’s out of the water and the power is off, there’s going to be a mechanism, bolts or dogs or zip ties or whatever, to keep them on - and someone has to remember to detach those as part of the launch.
Not sure whether it’s applicable here. But when learning scuba diving, we were taught (or rather reminded of, from middle school physics) that a balloon would become bigger as one gets closer to the surface. A balloon 90m under water will be 10X the size when it’s at surface. Therefore, using a balloon for emergency surfacing will lead to a monotonically increasing acceleration rate (which means you’ll going be too fast), or probably bursting the balloon half way through.
Interesting idea, I actually can't think of anything they are able to communicate that would aid in their rescue. They could probably signal if they are close to the surface, they won't be able to provide much more information on their exact location I think.
Its not the pressure, but the fact water blocks radio waves. Submarines can’t get GPS signals or transmit their location. Submarines have to rely on other means such as IMUs to track their own location.
The most frustrating is reading somewhere, I can't remember, that there was some discussion about beacons after having lost comms during an excursion in the past. The conversation apparently didn't get there.
My first proper job in my career was IT for a maritime navigation company. This must have been around 2000, and we were selling these to normal people that have boats. I can't believe they did not integrate EPIRB into something like this triggered by an emergency trigger within the vehicle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_position-indicating_...
The facts that even if the unclear "7 ways" to surface in case of emergency, that a) the ship doesn't know where the submersible is located, which GPS would easily solve for and b) if it does manage to use one of these seven ways there's no way to exit the vehicle is absolutely criminal.
If the banging hasn't been heard since could the sounds be related to the vessel imploding? Oxygen tanks or similar rupturing? You'd think if the passengers were still alive they'd continue to make noise at regular intervals or at least try to bang out an S-O-S in Morse code.
I don't know how they could be retrieved successfully since the US Navy DSRV crush depth is only 5,000 feet; the only hope they have if they're still alive, is to get the propulsion back so they can maneuver to a more shallow depth.
So sad.
While it's easy to be wise after the event, this thing does seem to be rather too Heath Robinson to be safe considering the extraordinarily challenging nature of the environment it operates in.
I am not even sure why we are looking for them, I don't think there is any way to setup rescue equipment that can go low enough to help them and drag that submersible out of the water before they would run out of oxygen.
[+] [-] AustinDev|2 years ago|reply
I can't imagine what is potentially going through their heads. If they are alive the 8 hour delay from Oceangate on reporting the incident to the USCG is likely going to result in massive liability, possibly criminal. Deep Sea rescues are extremely improbable and minutes matter let alone hours.
I have a hard time believing that this report is accurate but, it's possible. My best friend works at the lab that tests and certifies deep sea vessels for the navy, manned and unmanned, and he's 99% sure they're already gone due to an implosion. He actually was involved in the testing of one of their prototypes so has a pretty intimate knowledge of their construction. Cyclical fatigue on the carbon fiber hull is the likely culprit if such was their fate.
[+] [-] graypegg|2 years ago|reply
One guy is down there with his 19yo son… empathy is a powerful thing, imagining that situation just makes my heart sink.
[+] [-] HWR_14|2 years ago|reply
The biggest hope is that they are not terribly deep trapped near the surface and can be located in that time.
[+] [-] numpad0|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] upon_drumhead|2 years ago|reply
> The vessel was expected to resurface at 18:10 ADT.[16] Authorities were notified about the incident at 18:35 ADT.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Titan_submersible_incid...
One could argue that the delay once communications were lost is reasonable until the sub was overdue back.
[+] [-] gr8flyer1011|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|2 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] theossuary|2 years ago|reply
Honestly the chance of anyone being alive in the Titan is about as close to zero as you get; these rescuers want so badly to save them that they're hearing what they want to.
I hope I'm wrong though.
https://m.soundcloud.com/user-798629330/episode-261-the-uss-...
https://youtu.be/4dka29FSZac
[+] [-] peterbecich|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stringfood|2 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] totetsu|2 years ago|reply
Pragmatically speaking, this is of little consequence to most people, there are greater human tragedies going on, there are more catastrophic engineering failures happening, more egregious negligence,.. something about the unknown element of it.
[+] [-] bruceb|2 years ago|reply
Most tragedies the people are dead, outcome is known.
These situations usually have these things in common:
1. Very unusual situation
2. Race against the clock
3. Remote location
4. Extreme measures needed for rescue that may have never been done
5. May still die even if found
[+] [-] cracrecry|2 years ago|reply
In this particular story: Those guys are pioneers, they are doing something almost nobody has done before, like going deep down 4 kilometres under the surface of the ocean.
This takes guts. And people admire those that have the guts. It is primal instinct, as the people that take risks and survive usually makes the tribe or society improve.
Things that are routine today like planes flying without crashing down or reusable rockets or going to the moon were at some time extremely risky.
[+] [-] eternityforest|2 years ago|reply
Plus, being unable to call for help is not something we are used to. To me, just BEING somewhere where I could not contact anyone and nobody could get to me in an emergency sounds terrifying even if nothing was actively happening.
Plus, to laymen it seems like the tech to prevent it should be absolutely trivial in the age of satellites. If I was lost somewhere all because I didn't have a $200 beacon device I would be horrified, and these people paid $250k. I'd expect multiple redundant forms of communication, immediately surfacing with a refund if there was any sign of trouble, etc.
[+] [-] red_trumpet|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Hamuko|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] silisili|2 years ago|reply
If it were me or you, we'd be sleeping with the fishes without mention.
[+] [-] Rapzid|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 2-718-281-828|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] moltar|2 years ago|reply
Brown noise?
[+] [-] mpreda|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] madaxe_again|2 years ago|reply
Thing is, when it’s out of the water and the power is off, there’s going to be a mechanism, bolts or dogs or zip ties or whatever, to keep them on - and someone has to remember to detach those as part of the launch.
[+] [-] prox|2 years ago|reply
>The maker of the lost Titan submersible previously complained about strict passenger-vessel regulations, saying the industry was 'obscenely safe'
https://www.insider.com/titan-submarine-ceo-complained-about...
[+] [-] gene91|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] summarity|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nologic01|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ak_111|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|2 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] hellweaver666|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rirze|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jamesralph8555|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] truemotive|2 years ago|reply
My first proper job in my career was IT for a maritime navigation company. This must have been around 2000, and we were selling these to normal people that have boats. I can't believe they did not integrate EPIRB into something like this triggered by an emergency trigger within the vehicle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_position-indicating_...
The facts that even if the unclear "7 ways" to surface in case of emergency, that a) the ship doesn't know where the submersible is located, which GPS would easily solve for and b) if it does manage to use one of these seven ways there's no way to exit the vehicle is absolutely criminal.
[+] [-] yellow_lead|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bboygravity|2 years ago|reply
They don't have any GPS signal down there...
[+] [-] unknown|2 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] faefox|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gr8flyer1011|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tragomaskhalos|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kherndon33|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kherndon33|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] prmoustache|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] benjaminwai|2 years ago|reply
"It carries the Victor 6000 autonomous robot, capable of descending to a depth of 6,000 metres, beyond the 3,800 metres of the wreck's position"
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-send-ship-titani...
Last I checked on MarineTraffic Atalante was about 100NM away from site. Would it not help?
[+] [-] dan_mctree|2 years ago|reply