(no title)
max_streese | 2 years ago
I mean VS Code, Discord, Slack and Obsidian are all in very widespread use and work perfectly fine for me.
Are there alternatives to Electron that require less resources? Tauri seems to be proof that there are.
But I think there is real value in large communities and backing. Electron seems to work perfectly fine to me for everyday use as is evident by the applications mentioned above. I would personally choose Electron over Tauri even for greenfield projects, simply because Electron seems to power applications that are in much more widespread use.
BiteCode_dev|2 years ago
Having a latency on local clicks and transitions is not my idea of fun.
VSCode is an outlier here. And it's getting slower and slower with age, while sublime text is getting faster.
IceSentry|2 years ago
To be clear, your opinion is absolutely valid I just don't think they apply equally to everyone.
Capricorn2481|2 years ago
creshal|2 years ago
And VSCode has to be contrasted with Atom, which is the same but in so much worse: It takes a lot of effort to make Electron work well.
255kb|2 years ago
That being said, if a "drop-in" alternative would be available I would probably try to switch at one point. But the alternative would have to be on par with the ecosystem (including packaging, binaries signing, etc.), the community, the ease of use... I don't think there is such a thing yet.
The app, if you are interested: https://mockoon.com
ohgodplsno|2 years ago
crubier|2 years ago
Exact opposite, to me Electron is the living proof that software companies correctly care a lot about building a product people want, and correctly realize that the large majority of people correctly do not care that one of their top productivity app uses $1 worth of RAM, but want the app to have the features and UX they need instead.
The irrational obsession of part of the Hacker News crowd for the RAM usage of web apps is borderline psychotic. Man, take a chill pill, go get more RAM for a couple bucks once every 3 years, and let the engineers focus on UX and features ok? I don't want my productivity app to be a codegolf exercise
nottorp|2 years ago
You forgot about the times when two or more of the electron applications you run because you have no other option decide to take 20% CPU each or more.
Even if you make it a point of pride to run a computer that eats power measurable in kilowatts per hour, that's bad when on battery at least.
And from the article:
> One of the main core differences with Tauri is that it uses a Webview instead of using chromium like in Electron.
What's the difference? It will still end up eating all that ram and needlessly refreshing the cat gifs someone posted a day and a half ago.
dathinab|2 years ago
razemio|2 years ago
Also electron comes with its own advantages which many on HN seem to forget.
code-server for instance was very easy todo, because vscode was build using electron. It runs virtually anywhere. Uses fewer resources then most WMs on a headless device if you need a full blown IDE.
theappsecguy|2 years ago