So sad. Love F#, and Q# seemed like a natural extension, or at least brotherly.
At a high level, it seemed like F# is more functional like OCaml, than Rust is. I'd like to hear more about the reasoning, was it just performance? How different was it to justify a re-write?
This got me thinking of switching from F# to Rust, so did search and found this article that was good comparison. Others thinking of F# and Rust might dig.
Why not…just use rust then? I don’t understand the point of all of these niche languages in real life. Python, Go, rust, c, cpp, js, C#, kotlin, but why use others? Each of these have clearly defined strengths and community support.
There are multiple dimensions of trade-offs from which to choose from, i.e. runtime speed vs. convenience of writing, complexity of learning vs. powerful type systems, etc.
[+] [-] avestura|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nwah1|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] systems|2 years ago|reply
And personally i consider Rust to be from the OCaml/SML family of languages similar to F#, so i guess they moved within the family
[+] [-] pjmlp|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] FrustratedMonky|2 years ago|reply
At a high level, it seemed like F# is more functional like OCaml, than Rust is. I'd like to hear more about the reasoning, was it just performance? How different was it to justify a re-write?
[+] [-] hu3|2 years ago|reply
My guess is because Rust is great with WebAssembly and they seem to target it with Q#:
https://github.com/microsoft/qsharp/tree/main/wasm
[+] [-] FrustratedMonky|2 years ago|reply
https://jkone27-3876.medium.com/f-is-the-net-rust-62f71f8dae...
[+] [-] adamnemecek|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zohvek|2 years ago|reply
tldr: developers
[+] [-] Dudester230602|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] asylteltine|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hu3|2 years ago|reply
It's arguably different enough of a domain to justify a new language.
[+] [-] unknown|2 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] proc0|2 years ago|reply