Is there anything the NY Post can't try to blame on wokeness?
The objection seems to be age, not race:
> “I wanted our team to be younger, to be inspirational and I’m not going to inspire a 16-year-old to go pursue marine technology, but a 25-year-old, uh, you know, who’s a sub pilot or a platform operator or one of our techs can be inspirational,” said Rush.
Did Oceangate or its founder(s) say they intended to 'move fast and break things', or are you just imputing that they held those beliefs? The company purported to "maintain[] high-level operational safety".
> Metro reports that last year, when asked about the safety of the Titan submersible, Stockton Rush, OceanGate’s CEO, said, “You know, there’s a limit. At some point safety just is pure waste. I mean if you just want to be safe, don’t get out of bed. Don’t get in your car. Don’t do anything. At some point, you’re going to take some risk, and it really is a risk/reward question. I think I can do this just as safely by breaking the rules.”
> Rush's experience and research led him to two basic conclusions: one, that submersibles had an unwarranted reputation as dangerous vehicles due to their use in ferrying commercial divers, and two, the Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993 "needlessly prioritized passenger safety over commercial innovation".
meepmorp|2 years ago
jacquesm|2 years ago
Qem|2 years ago
neaden|2 years ago
Qem|2 years ago
mensetmanusman|2 years ago
[deleted]
ceejayoz|2 years ago
The objection seems to be age, not race:
> “I wanted our team to be younger, to be inspirational and I’m not going to inspire a 16-year-old to go pursue marine technology, but a 25-year-old, uh, you know, who’s a sub pilot or a platform operator or one of our techs can be inspirational,” said Rush.
Not an uncommon scenario at startups.
nickff|2 years ago
toomuchtodo|2 years ago
https://jalopnik.com/oceangate-ceo-called-safety-a-waste-sui...
ceejayoz|2 years ago
> Rush's experience and research led him to two basic conclusions: one, that submersibles had an unwarranted reputation as dangerous vehicles due to their use in ferrying commercial divers, and two, the Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993 "needlessly prioritized passenger safety over commercial innovation".
jacquesm|2 years ago
https://www.google.com/search?q=stockton+rush+quotes
lamontcg|2 years ago
Pretty much says it there along with a rationalization about why the company should ignore any outside experts due to "innovation".