(no title)
hoorible | 2 years ago
> to describe a real and fairly obvious problem with VC backed firms striving for profitability
Not sure if intentional on your part but that really seemed written as it these firms are worthy of any kind of sympathy. They aren’t. They make a shiny new thing, running unsustainably to entice new users, with the explicit goal of making it worse later on to increase profits once it’s taken off. Enshittification is in the plan from day one, and they deserve every bit of scrutiny and criticism they get for it. Fuck em.
tacticalturtle|2 years ago
I’m not saying we should feel bad for these firms engaging in these practices.
hoorible|2 years ago
I do totally get the desire for more sophisticated (no snark) phrasing, given the incredibly huge impact this phenomenon has on lives and livelihoods everywhere, but I think the crassness of it is effective, particularly in two ways: first, keeping the focus on the what (making things worse) more than the why (profit). Other terms I’ve seen like “value extraction spiral” don’t do that the same way. The second thing is it makes discussing it with a broader audience easier; when my very non-technical parents complain about how their facebook is so much worse now, I very briefly describe enshittification and they immediately just get it in a way that doesn’t happen when I talk about other industry concepts with them.
unsui|2 years ago
The reason "enshitification" hits so hard is precisely because it doesn't hold back; it's supposed to make you feel uncomfortable.
Would you prefer a more sanitized term? (one that more thoroughly obscures the intent with safe and harmless language?)
paulryanrogers|2 years ago
hoorible|2 years ago
Ekaros|2 years ago
All that should have been illegal from day 8... I can give a week of promotion, but anything beyond that should always happen at cost or above.