top | item 3647611

Microsoft's Azure cloud down and out for 8 hours

151 points| pshken | 14 years ago |theregister.co.uk | reply

56 comments

order
[+] powertower|14 years ago|reply
This seems to be about some odd certificate issue, not the network, which caused Microsoft to take access to its service management system down.

From the article itself:

> It later added that less than 3.8 per cent of hosted services had been affected.

If this was about Google or Apple, this submit would already have been flagged, taken off the front page, and several accounts would have been hell-banned.

</endjoke, but it's really true>

It will be interesting to see if Microsoft expands on this issue and if we can learn something about it... Perhaps other datacenters are also vulnerable to cert issues in their management systems.

[+] ChuckMcM|14 years ago|reply
"We have identified the root cause of this incident. It has been traced back to a cert issue triggered on 2/29/2012 GMT," the software giant said.

So here is a quiz for you, does you software know that this is a leap year? I'll speculate that someone's software didn't recognize it as such. Personally I'm always on the lookout for this sort of 'weird' thing because in the world of testing the edge cases are often poorly tested.

[+] stickfigure|14 years ago|reply
Compare this to administering machines yourself: Your "admin console" goes down every night for 8 hours while your sysadmin is asleep.
[+] ww520|14 years ago|reply
Can you elaborate what is the cert issue that causing the service down? It's always good to learn from temporary failure.
[+] drivebyacct2|14 years ago|reply
></endjoke, but it's really true>

Seriously? Alarmist flamebait headlines about Google and Apple stuff gets posted near daily.

[+] bry|14 years ago|reply
The most frustrating thing for me was the complete lack of any real communication from Microsoft. For awhile, even their status dashboard was down. I only found out about it after I got a PagerDuty alert and had to search Twitter (other people complaining about it) to confirm.

We have an Azure CDN backed by a Compute Instance, and zero official notice from Microsoft about this still. I've learned more about the problem from news articles than the company that provides the service. Fortunately we haven't finished migrating the rest of the site to Azure. No emails from them, nothing. Not even a tweet on their official @WindowsAzure account. Frustrating.

[+] d4nt|14 years ago|reply
I guess this sort of thing was bound to happen at some point. As the article says, all the major cloud platforms have had outages at some point.

As someone who is actively considering building products using this platform I'm keen to see how well they manage this issue. How do they communicate during the outage, how open about what went wrong are they afterwards, do they learn from it, and so on. I particularly like the efforts Amazon have gone to in the past to show they are learning from these issues (see http://aws.amazon.com/message/65648/) I'm hopeful that Microsoft will show the same level of openness.

[+] chollida1|14 years ago|reply
I feel bad when ever I hear about outages at companies like this.

I'm in charge of technology for a hedge fund with 15 people and I get freaked out each time we roll out a new piece of software.

[+] latchkey|14 years ago|reply
Heroku Dyno's were down for a lot of clients for several hours on saturday. One site that I use a lot, Intercom.io, was completely off the grid because of this. I was wondering why there was no news about it here.

https://status.heroku.com/incident/308

[+] andrewem|14 years ago|reply
It's unclear how big a deal this outage was, as I can never make heads or tails of what's really behind an article in the The Register.

That said, I run an app on Heroku and noticed that outage - Pingdom sent me a bunch of emails, which I saw after a day spent outside. The first thing I do when I get a Pingdom failure notice is check status.heroku.com, and sure enough they had an issue and were working on fixing it. I wasn't particularly expecting there to be mention of it on HN because, first, it wasn't an enormous outage, second, it was on the weekend, and third Heroku always does such a great job of posting about issues.

I don't know if they did so, but I'd expect Intercom.io and other affected sites to post information letting people know that the site is down and why. I haven't tried it yet but Heroku allows you to specify a custom error page to be served [1], which you could update on the fly to let people know what's going on. For other outages I have let users know via Twitter and Facebook, though obviously there's no substitute for a nice up-to-date static error page.

[1] http://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/custom_error_pages

[+] andypants|14 years ago|reply
I'm sure I read about the heroku downtime on hacker news. Maybe it got pushed off the front page pretty quickly though.
[+] Tloewald|14 years ago|reply
So is this a feb 29 bug? Problem occurred, it seems, at the advent of 2/29 GMT. Worst date handling ever?
[+] Maxious|14 years ago|reply
Apparently electronic payment systems from ATMs to merchant terminals to HMO claim machines all went straight to march 1st. Hilarity ensued.
[+] joshmaker|14 years ago|reply
"We have identified the root cause of this incident. It has been traced back to a cert issue triggered on 2/29/2012 GMT"
[+] kokey|14 years ago|reply
I think this is the problem with rewriting platforms, libraries and languages from scratch instead of incrementally chiseling it into something stable like in the open unix world.
[+] speedracr|14 years ago|reply
As a non-tech observer, Azure actually struck me as an honest attempt by Microsoft to add a compelling offer to the mix. However, their status page-cum-website seem to be hosted on Azure itself, which is ridiculous in a situation like this. (Almost like Twitter having a status page on tumblr.) Worst of all, even www.twitter.com/windowsazure offers no comment at all so far. Isn't this wiping out any credibility they might have built up with developers? Is anyone affected?

Edit: if this truly is because of 2/29, I guess anyone signing up from now on will get perfect service.

[+] ot|14 years ago|reply
> Edit: if this truly is because of 2/29, I guess anyone signing up from now on will get perfect service.

At least for the next 4 years

[+] sriramk|14 years ago|reply
I don't think that's true. Because I remember giving somebody a lot of pain for exactly that when I worked there. Of course, it might have been gone down for other reasons.
[+] TeHCrAzY|14 years ago|reply
Weird, we have a couple of respectable (80+ requests per second) services running on azure in the SE asia zone, and I can't see any problems at all.

That said, we only rely on table storage and our instance count is mostly static.

[+] chubot|14 years ago|reply
So just "service management" is down, but the apps themselves are up? If so that's better than Heroku's recent downtime.
[+] sriramk|14 years ago|reply
Disclaimer: ex-Windows Azure person, no insider knowledge on this particular outage

That's typically because the 'service management service' typically kicks in when it needs to do things - allocate capacity, restart things when stuff goes down, etc. By default, it isn't touching the running apps inside VMs. There is no Windows Azure equivalent to Heroku's routing mesh to be taken down; the requests go to the VMs directly via the various networking layers.

[+] ahrens|14 years ago|reply
We had problems today. We had the bad luck that one of our web roles crashed during the time the admin interface was down. That meant we couldn't restart it and neither could microsoft. We will be adding instances to the role to avoid similar problems. Otherwise, we are very happy with Azure.
[+] TeHCrAzY|14 years ago|reply
Can you explain what your problem is? Azure will automatically restart instances that are dead afaik (unless you are saying that the automatic restarting was broken as well?).
[+] dragosstancu|14 years ago|reply
That sucks, we have a bunch of media stored with them and we're looking forward to using the cloud for some .NET based intensive processing (reporting).

A bit off topic: I've been trying for days to get Azure to work with .webm or .ogv files. Maybe I'm using the wrong tool (CloudBerry). I want to be able to deliver HTML5 video from the cloud but I'm without success for FF users. Luckily, my video player features a Flash fallback which is awesome.

[+] barranger|14 years ago|reply
was the media stored in blob storage? From the article it looks like storage accounts weren't effected, just the management api and ~4% of service accounts.
[+] securingsincity|14 years ago|reply
Considering they are announcing the windows 8 consumer preview right now and possibly other new cloud related features not good timing at all.
[+] JonoW|14 years ago|reply
Article is not clear whether Azure instances are down, or just the service management tools? But either way, ouch!
[+] noahhs|14 years ago|reply
Today's outage took down our website, our computing grid, everything. And this afternoon, when Microsoft said "the majority" of Azure clients were back up and running, we were still in the dark. Dammit.
[+] krmmalik|14 years ago|reply
I wonder if this explains why i have been having problems with Siri? I know that sounds far fetched but isnt Apple relying on Azure now?
[+] jstclair|14 years ago|reply
Don't know why you got downvoted - AFAIK Siri isn't tied to Azure (although it could be using it for storage), but iCloud runs across both Azure and Amazon.
[+] wonderercat|14 years ago|reply
I think it's interesting that the #1 feature on their features page is labeled "Always up. Always on."
[+] cache77|14 years ago|reply
Maybe they forgot to account for leap year in their programming :/