[soonnow]

Can I just say that aside from the presented facts. I really liked the reporting. It clearly explained what the study showed and what the studies didn't show.

I think science reporting should be more like that. It's ok to have an article that says well we found a link but we are not clear yet on what's the exact cause, but we know what's not the cause

Aside from the clickbait-y headline of course.

[Workaccount2]

It's because the publication is well funded from other sources. It's not dependent on drawing lowest common denominator people in to view ads.