(no title)
dkokelley | 2 years ago
Is there an acceptable threshold of free viewing before it becomes abusive? (Think, getting a single free See's candy from the store vs. employing an army of people to source thousands of pounds of chocolate treats.)
With the Reddit API issue I'm honestly unsure where I stand. I love(d) Apollo and want it to succeed, but Reddit is doing the work and not getting the rewards. Where do you draw the line at "fair"?
Waterluvian|2 years ago
In fact I think this is good. It makes it very clear that no, it’s not your content and no, you don’t deserve any rights just because you feel like you own it. Twitter will do as it pleases with “your” content.
I would very much welcome a far more informed environment where people were forced to face the details of IP rights and what it means to post content on these services.
medler|2 years ago
chris_wot|2 years ago
1. Is it worthwhile giving free labour to these services by generating their content,
and,
2. Do we want to login and/or pay to check user generated content?
Personally, I think the answer will be no. If these services generated their own content, which we actually value, then it would be a different matter. But they don’t, so if they put up road blocks I suspect they will get a bit of a shock to learn they aren’t actually as vital to society as they thought they were.
recursive|2 years ago