top | item 36574541

(no title)

sombremesa | 2 years ago

Microsoft employees are some of the most complacent I've ever seen. Some of my Microsoftie friends haven't had an interview (aside from maybe one or two recruiter calls) in over ten years, having been there since graduation. Needless to say, their comp is peanuts. Yet they frequently stay at work late and have to drop engagements as a result.

Microsoft has the magic formula for lifers who don't ask much and work just as hard as anyone else, if not harder (by big tech standards — startups folks work way harder for way less).

discuss

order

gregd|2 years ago

What you call complacency, I call contentment. Some of us don't like job hopping. Still others of us don't like startup or hustle culture. Some of us have families to support and are quite content to work hard for better than average salaries and benefits, live and work where we want to, engage with friends we've made at work (even across business teams), build retirement. Some of us have even spent many months out of each year, traveling the world with some of our coworkers.

JohnFen|2 years ago

Totally valid. But at least with the Microsoft engineers that I know well enough to have frank conversations with, half of them are the the opposite of content. They are unhappy, but feel trapped by their careers at Microsoft.

I get it, change is scary, but I do remind them that there is a larger world outside of Microsoft and there is very likely a better situation out there for them if they look for it.

glimshe|2 years ago

As an ex-Microsoftie who's now making more money for less work... Why commit to a company who isn't committed to you? Because I have no commitment to ANY company, I ended up having more savings for me and my family than if I had stayed, that's why I ask.

Oh, BTW: no company is committed to you, only you and your family/friends (if you're lucky) will ever be.

sombremesa|2 years ago

> What you call complacency, I call contentment.

Contentment and complacency are ostensibly the same thing, though the primary reason I tend towards the latter term is because I think we ought to aspire to growth (in whatever sense you determine for yourself). That's just my opinion though. It's also worth noting that I have no way of knowing what others are aspiring to, aside from what happens in their life over the years (which can be a poor proxy, given the role of luck).

seattle_spring|2 years ago

All of those things are possible at other companies, with much higher pay to boot.

lnxg33k1|2 years ago

Omg they hired the HR from the PRC, how much social credits you got from this post?

noleetcode|2 years ago

Not at Microsoft, but have been at a company for a very long time being underpaid. I haven't left simply due to one issue: I refuse to do leetcode interviews. I've dipped my toes into the waters every once in a while and even the companies that swear to me up and down before interviews that they don't do leetcode, well, guess what I discover during the interview loop...

JohnFen|2 years ago

> I haven't left simply due to one issue: I refuse to do leetcode interviews.

If it helps any to know this, I get compensated at least as well as Microsoft (or equivalent) companies provide and have never had to do a single leetcode interview. I've never even been asked.

As near as I can tell, leetcode is used by a certain subset of the industry. But the industry as a whole is much larger than those companies.

rufus_foreman|2 years ago

>> I refuse to do leetcode interviews

I don't know what the bounds of leetcode are but can you translate that into something that would make sense in other domains?

Like if you wanted to hire a musician, you might want to hear them play first. Is that completely unreasonable?

electroly|2 years ago

I had always heard of Microsoft as a good "rest and vest" employer: lower pay than its competitors but also less work and less stress. Is the latter part not true? I've heard it compared to a place like Amazon that is high pay but high stress.

filoleg|2 years ago

> lower pay than its competitors but also less work and less stress. Is the latter part not true?

Unless you are in Azure org (and maybe some other small specialized teams i am not aware of), it is often true.

Source: worked outside of Azure myself, it was great. WLB by default was nice and chill, but there was always plenty of room to push for more, if you wanted promotions/rewards/high-impact projects under your belt. People were amazing too all around. Had plenty of friends who worked in different orgs too. A couple of them transferred to Azure, and they quit a year or two later. They said that it felt like working for AWS in terms of how brutal it was (with one of them actually having used to work for AWS prior), which was night and day compared to their previous teams at MSFT.

demographicsmbe|2 years ago

There are a lot of foreign born msofties. Their comparison model to what is acceptable is different than the rest of us. That is why they don't muddy the water. On top of that, there are a lot of converted and unconverted H1Bs. The difference in culture in the MS population explains a lot actually.

remote_phone|2 years ago

Msft stock is up 10X in 10 years. They are all multi millionaires. I would be complacent too and quibbling over 3% probably isn’t at the top of my list of priorities

sombremesa|2 years ago

> They are all multi millionaires.

Sure, but so am I — and I know for a fact they make very little, because of the way they talk about our mutual friends' job offers — I cannot even tell them my salary, to be honest. (Making less money is not a bad thing, but the pertinent point is that they work longer hours than I do, in the same industry!)

> Msft stock is up 10X in 10 years.

Here I'd like to correct you on one point — stock going up like this does not necessarily equate to outsized wealth. When you join as a new grad, you get very little stock, and as you get more grants, they are market-adjusted (not to mention vested over time). Plus the early stock inevitably gets sold to buy a home, etc.

Feel free to ignore me if you knew these things.

solarkraft|2 years ago

What a surprise - complacency with bad situations is exactly what I envision when using (most) Microsoft software.

elkos|2 years ago

You said that their compensation is peanuts, is there a source one can look up upon? Just for the curious people like me.

sombremesa|2 years ago

You can look on levels.fyi for current comp, but it's a bit harder to find what someone's comp is like if they started ten years ago. Perhaps you could look at H1B data and extrapolate at a 3-5% raise p.a. with larger bumps every now and then. Even at just today's numbers though, MSFT lags behind comparable employers.