(no title)
anotherman554 | 2 years ago
This isn't a field like engineering where there are objective right and wrong answers and anyone dies if you pass the students who are not so great at writing essays on literature.
anotherman554 | 2 years ago
This isn't a field like engineering where there are objective right and wrong answers and anyone dies if you pass the students who are not so great at writing essays on literature.
throwaway675309|2 years ago
anotherman554|2 years ago
Depending on the assignment you aren't necessarily expected to read anyone else's take on a book and you aren't expected to make sure you are saying something that hasn't been said before or anything like that.
You are simply expected to analyze the book and offer an interpretation.
And it's not like that's the only way to use the AI. With a few minutes of effort, I just got CHATGPT to write an essay using "post-colonial theory" to interpret the Wizard of Oz, which was pretty interesting.
rvba|2 years ago
Also big chance to get a C or a D when you came up with a "novel" approach that the shitty and boring book is actually shitty and boring.
Hell no school was there to stop making your own interpetations different than the official one.
Damn, even on the fucking retarded drawing lesseons (where probably half of stuff was drawn by parents) the teachers would deduct points for any individual style.
I was thinking of getting an MBA, but does it even get any better for "adults"? Arent you just tought to repeat some schematics, which often are bullshit.