(no title)
vodkapump | 2 years ago
Gnome on the other hand has never missed a beat, despite having it's issues needing solved with extensions. Performance wise it's always been 10/10, even on my 3x4k setup.
Wish I didn't need wayland, because I really just want to go back to xfce..
NovaDudely|2 years ago
My only issue with it is that it seems to try to do a little too much - but that is just a matter of taste.
Personally, KDE is the jack of all trades - it can do anything you ask it, Gnome goes a little too simple, I really like Cinnamon as a middle ground. But each to their own.
vodkapump|2 years ago
To me my favourite is xfce by far, it is so simple and fast without being too simple where it becomes an inconvenience. But, I need wayland so Gnome and KDE are the only really good alternatives for now. (Yes I know there are plenty of alternatives like sway, enlightenment, etc etc but no.)
xeyownt|2 years ago
Main complain is that it is noticeably slow and the GUI looks like an experiment to turn all pixels into clickable things. I think there is nice tech under the hood, but that's not what I'm looking for.
Dead_Lemon|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
pluijzer|2 years ago
AnonCoward42|2 years ago
It was then when I tried the obviously inferior Gnome (3.28 iirc). And while I felt a bit constraint with it, I was so much quicker with it.
JohnFen|2 years ago
I do hate those (but I hate all animations/transitions in desktop environments). You can turn them all off, though -- that's what I do.
sangnoir|2 years ago
This may be an issue with your specific hardware. I never encountered slow-downs with KDE, even when fancy compositor-effects were new and I went overboard[1] with them, everything was smooth as butter.
1. Who wouldn't want their wobbly, semi-transparent windows to disappear in a burst of flames when closed?
vodkapump|2 years ago
I really do not understand it, it's almost as if KDE just runs out of sync with my heads internal fps.