top | item 36627043

(no title)

routelastresort | 2 years ago

90% of my timeline is on Threads is all stuff I don't even follow, while Bluesky is exactly what I ask for. Decentralized platforms are the only way to go, even if it's the centralized version and vision. The Zucc way of ramming (overly) suggested content and ads down your throat will die if there are alternatives.

discuss

order

fastball|2 years ago

> Decentralized platforms are the way to go even if it is centralized

Wat.

botanical|2 years ago

Probably as in you can move your account to another server seamlessly. Mastodon also relies on "centralised" servers; none of them are p2p

8organicbits|2 years ago

You cropped the key part

> ... centralized version and vision

femiagbabiaka|2 years ago

I thought Bluesky was only decentralized in theory. Have alternative open source servers been released?

s3krit|2 years ago

They've launched the 'sandbox' which is the federated/decentralised dev/staging environment. So yes, you can run your own PDS (server) and have it federate with others, but it's still very much in development and 'here be dragons'

https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds/blob/main/SANDBOX.md

justapassenger|2 years ago

They announced that more feed options, including followers only are coming.

They rushed to market.

atq2119|2 years ago

Considering that "followed only" is far simpler to build, that's a pretty lame excuse and doesn't do anything to change my opinion about whether they're priorities are healthy.

bowsamic|2 years ago

> 90% of my timeline is on Threads is all stuff I don't even follow

Most people want this though. They don't just want to see people they follow, they want to be served an endless stream of takes and fight videos

guraf|2 years ago

[deleted]

_nhynes|2 years ago

A less uncharitable interpretation of the parent comment is that decentralized platforms are the only way to guarantee personal freedom, save a saintly BDFL or government regulation. Not likely to happen.

The “even if it’s the centralized version” is an acknowledgement that some users may prefer centralization, or the platform is still too young to usefully decentralize. As long as there is a way out, or a credible plan, freedom is preserved.

The third Matrix succeeded due to choice—even at the subconscious level.