top | item 36658063 (no title) revelio | 2 years ago The ecology isn't collapsing either. discuss order hn newest ygjb|2 years ago https://www.reuters.com/graphics/GLOBAL-ENVIRONMENT/INSECT-A...https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-warn-o...Just two quick examples, but go ahead and keep your head in the sand. revelio|2 years ago The first is the insectopocalypse, which has been debunked:https://theconversation.com/insect-apocalypse-not-so-fast-at...The second is a prediction for 300 years in the future. But we're talking about the claim "the ecology is collapsing", present tense.
ygjb|2 years ago https://www.reuters.com/graphics/GLOBAL-ENVIRONMENT/INSECT-A...https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-warn-o...Just two quick examples, but go ahead and keep your head in the sand. revelio|2 years ago The first is the insectopocalypse, which has been debunked:https://theconversation.com/insect-apocalypse-not-so-fast-at...The second is a prediction for 300 years in the future. But we're talking about the claim "the ecology is collapsing", present tense.
revelio|2 years ago The first is the insectopocalypse, which has been debunked:https://theconversation.com/insect-apocalypse-not-so-fast-at...The second is a prediction for 300 years in the future. But we're talking about the claim "the ecology is collapsing", present tense.
ygjb|2 years ago
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-warn-o...
Just two quick examples, but go ahead and keep your head in the sand.
revelio|2 years ago
https://theconversation.com/insect-apocalypse-not-so-fast-at...
The second is a prediction for 300 years in the future. But we're talking about the claim "the ecology is collapsing", present tense.