When smart people decide not to accept a given fact no matter the evidence, they become really good at denying it. Instead of accepting the fact, there is always the next "what about ...?"
Appeal to authority fallacy occurs when someone asserts a claim solely based on the authority or expertise of an individual or group, without considering the evidence supporting the claim. However, in the case of climate change, the scientific consensus is derived from a robust body of evidence and research conducted by thousands of scientists worldwide
Do you have an example? Because all of the variations in recorded history, the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age, were less than 0.5C. Also, both were regional and came on over centuries.
Also, the difference between the Ice Age and current interglacial was only 4C. The transition took 6000 years. We are approaching 1.5C and should hit 3C. That is the opposite of Ice Age in a century.
karmakurtisaani|2 years ago
tracker1|2 years ago
[deleted]
_fs|2 years ago
ianburrell|2 years ago
Also, the difference between the Ice Age and current interglacial was only 4C. The transition took 6000 years. We are approaching 1.5C and should hit 3C. That is the opposite of Ice Age in a century.
Natuerich|2 years ago
[deleted]