For me the most relevant selling point of GraalVM is beeing able to compile to native self-contained executable. But on the other hand, Golang delivers on this aspect much better (or at least much faster).
This gist narrowly predates Clojure GraalVM tooling that enables eg Babashka and Clojure usage in cloud FaaS with low cold start latency. And quick startup CLI tools like clj-kondo (a Clojure linter).
It seems there's some WebAssembly related things cooking GraalVM, currently just support for running wasm binaries but will be be interesting to see if eventually we get support for targeting WebAssembly (if WebAssembly one day gets good GC support).
The decision to make Clojure JVM based and so slow to startup has slowed it's adoption to a much more significant level than anyone in the Clojure community is willing to accept.
/s noted, and sure Oracle are litigious, but the GPL community version of GraalVM, plus "early adopter" enterprise version licence[0] seems farily clear, and reasonable - at least as far as Oracle are concerned?
No sarcasm tag required. Exposure to oracle is a business risk. I expect any architect to think pretty hard before allowing anything owned by oracle into the stack.
[+] [-] xonix|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fulafel|2 years ago|reply
It seems there's some WebAssembly related things cooking GraalVM, currently just support for running wasm binaries but will be be interesting to see if eventually we get support for targeting WebAssembly (if WebAssembly one day gets good GC support).
[+] [-] kasajian|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] amelius|2 years ago|reply
Getting sued by Oracle.
/s
[+] [-] chris_overseas|2 years ago|reply
[0] https://www.oracle.com/downloads/licenses/graal-free-license... https://blogs.oracle.com/java/post/graalvm-free-license
[+] [-] appleflaxen|2 years ago|reply
This was the first thing that came to mind when I saw this.
[+] [-] psd1|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gavinray|2 years ago|reply
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33893120
[+] [-] manojlds|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ccleve|2 years ago|reply