The SimCity games I've played in the past rely too heavily on separated zoning and car traffic, often with broken transit AI (sims don't go backwards to reach a nearby transit stop) and no concept of walkability. While I don't think you should have to build your SimCity in a new urbanist style, it would be nice to make it an option.
Streets were basically pure downside in most iterations of SimCity. There was almost no point to making them. The second you laid down some road, you were incurring more problems than you were solving. As one of the posters mentioned here, it was entirely possible -- and maybe even optimal -- to design cities entirely devoid of roads.
I distinctly recall more than a few rail-only cities that flourished a lot better than any of my road-based or mixed-transportation cities ever did. Seemed vaguely unrealistic, until I realized what SimCity is actually about. At its heart, SimCity is about two things: 1) Acquiring residents; and 2) keeping the lives of those residents as comfortable and stress-free as possible. (Seriously -- the game would require you to take this to almost Wall-E levels of extremity).
That's what really annoyed me about 4. The lack of new traffic and urban designs. I really wanted:
- Roundabouts
- Traffic Circles
- Shared Spaces (no separation between road and sidewalk)
- Light Rail
- Street Cars
- High Speed Rail
- Bus Stops that didn't take up a whole block space
- People Movers (like the one in Miami, FL)
- Bike Lanes / Bike Paths
- Bridging neighborhoods together with sidewalks
- Walk-able Plazas that residents would actually use instead of being lazy
- Small 2 lane highways
- Bridge control
- Better street control so that every intersection doesn't force cars to stop and go.
And why on earth did they claim the Mono-Rail was the fastest public transit and best for intercity connectivity?! Monorails are notoriously slow and terrible for anything other than amusement park transportation.
The rigid separation of zones drove me nuts when I last played SimCity 4. Here in Vienna it's completely normal to have flats, shops and offices in every building. As far as I know this is even more extreme in Asian cities.
What I would love to see would be a triangle slider for zoning where you could for instance say this block should be 60% residential , 25% industrial and 15% commercial. Maybe some industries or commercial venues will require higher percentages to settle but this could also be an interesting tool.
Is it just me or was SimCity a better game back when it was still 2D? Personally I lost interest in the series when they switched to full 3D. I might be willing to pay for an advanced SimCity game in the style of OpenTTD (http://www.openttd.org/en/screenshot/1.0/20101010_panswat_to...) I really like OpenTTD but you don't really have direct control over the city, only the transportation.
I don't think they ever did switch to full 3D, did they? Certainly, SimCity 4 was still in the top-down style. There was a competing game, Cities XL, which was fully 3D but never really gained much traction (partly because it was pants).
I like the idea of multiplayer, but I'm not sure how interesting would it be for cities to interact... sounds a bit too forced IMHO.
But then I had a crazy idea. Could we have a sim-city + transport tycoon in one massively-multiplayer game where people choose which variant they want to control? I'd pay lots of money for the possibility to play that. Imagine the situation where you actually have to look profitable to other players for them to invest in further development of your city by providing their services...
What led to the demise of games like this? More time-intensive, slow, thinking games; simulations like these have always held interest for a lot of people. I certainly didn't become less willing to buy them.
Combat flight simulators are another thing that seems to have disappeared.
I'm far more excited by this then by another mindless space-marine-kills-aliens game.
Once you get off the low-hanging fruit like cities, small countries, and civilizations (SimCity, Tropico, and Civilization, respectively), simulation games require domain knowledge in order to be fun. Since commercial games are aimed at a mass market and require higher costs for things like 3D graphics engines and game assets, this means that anything that narrows the addressable market, like requiring tons of domain knowledge to play the game effectively, makes it a less profitable investment. So you have to go for things that lots of people have domain knowledge about already, something like professional soccer. Which is why one of the best selling time-intensive, slow, thinking games out there is Football Manager.
I'm counting Football Manager over other sports games because in other sports games you actually control the players, whereas in Football Manager you only get to be the manager, and most of what you do in terms of buying and selling players, dealing with contracts, selecting players for a match, designing tactics and so forth are all classic sim-game stuff with lots of going through menu systems and toggling switches and moving sliders and none of the arcade stuff. Even matches you just sit there and watch (in abbreviated highlight form, or with an eye on match data), and occasionally make substitutions or tactical adjustments. If you didn't actually like soccer a great deal, you wouldn't really care; if you did, you might be willing to pay for new features and roster updates every year or two.
Dammit, well.... EA has the Sims 3 and Sim City 4 on Steam. I think they only did it with massively high selling games like Battlefield because of Steam taking 30%.
I was expecting that that the game was aimed to iOS devices because of those pictures, kept reading waiting for the revolutionary touch interface to be mentioned
It is due to the trend of putting as much unrelated content on articles to incite clicks to yet another slideshow/top X list and ramp up the almighty page view.
Here is a screenshot of the page with the actual article content highlighted.
The article references that it will be in 3D -- not a big deal to today's games, but I remember buying SimCopter because it allowed me to take my SimCity(2000 I think?) city and fly around in it -- including running missions through it. I hope they do something similar with the new build.
I was super pumped to see this headline, as just a couple of weeks ago I was browsing the wikipedia articles for the original series of games, and considered getting on some old school action, so I'm psyched that there's gonna be a new Sim City. I'm not psyched that the official site with the video links and new features, etc., is a gigantic mess of Drupal errors :(
It's called a reboot, they use it to start the series over with new design principles and modern technology. Calling it SimCity 5 would imply that it was successor tos SimCity 4 or 3 or 2000 etc... when it might not be.
To take an existing example, Star Trek (2009) is not a sequel or a prequel to Star Trek (1966-2008). It's a new piece of work rendering the old line as complete.
The naming convention from SimCity 2000 => SimCity 3000 was not sustainable. The name SimCity 3000 was an over-promise, and should have been simply SimCity 2001. (See my above comment about Maxis almost running out of money trying to deliver on the promise of a version of SimCity 3000 that was 1000 years more advanced than the previous version of SimCity 2000.)
I had an idea a few years back to build a multi-layer sim-world game
You would have players create families of Sims, where they would have full control over their individual Home and families, then add on the ability to get elected to a sort of community leader role with control over neighborhoods, then elected Mayor with full control over the entire city. Maybe even add Governers that have some power over collections of cities to for a state and wold be able to build certain infrastructure between cities. Maybe add another tier above that where a few selected players would be able to become Leaders of Nations and create laws and create national Infrastructure and the like.
Of course in this system, all players are elected to positions, creating a sort of Sim Government kind of thing.
Theoretically such a game would appeal to a wide range of gamers, from the casual gamer just creating a couple Sim families to the hard-core gamer with being able to manage huge and complex societies amde up of other players.
I've been fascinated with that idea for years - multi-layer largely independent games that affect each other. I've been playing with the idea in the board game space, for example, having a board game where the players are gods fighting each other, being played at the same time as a board game with the players as men competing against each other, with events in each game effecting the other. Does anybody know of any games (board or other) on the market that operate like this? I'd be curious to check them out.
I don't get the Post's headline. EA published 'SimCity Societies' in 2007 and an expansion pack in 2008, they even mention it in the article. With the inevitable impact of The Sims' mass appeal, and the industry-wide interest in broadening their market by making games, well, simpler, perhaps the article writer feels that nothing has been a "real" SimCity game since Sim City 4, I guess?
It's an important point, whether the series is returning to it's roots of complexity from ten years ago, or if it will be a continuation of the franchise's modern-day releases. But the article leaves a very confusing impression.
I suppose they might mean to highlight this is the first SimCity game developed by Maxis themselves since 2003, but with Will Wright gone and 10 years of staff turnover, is there really much difference between a SimCity game being developed by "Maxis" instead of by any other outside developer?
SimCity Societies doesn't count. That's like saying "The Sims: Urbz" was a part of the Sims series. Different developers just using the brand, it played more like a really dumbed down version of Civ crossed with Spore.
I was having a chat with a friend about Minecraft and how it's an "on ground" version of SimCity, at a much simpler level of building (literally) from the ground, out, and up.
SimCity 4 still brings my current laptop to its knees. If it wasn't for the inevitable graphics glitches (which may in fact be my video card overheating, who knows), I would still be playing it regularly.
Its probably because the game itself was designed for single-processor machines and was never adapted to SMP systems. The graphics glitches are likely because the game depended on certain features of older GPUs
[+] [-] philwelch|14 years ago|reply
The SimCity games I've played in the past rely too heavily on separated zoning and car traffic, often with broken transit AI (sims don't go backwards to reach a nearby transit stop) and no concept of walkability. While I don't think you should have to build your SimCity in a new urbanist style, it would be nice to make it an option.
[+] [-] jonnathanson|14 years ago|reply
I distinctly recall more than a few rail-only cities that flourished a lot better than any of my road-based or mixed-transportation cities ever did. Seemed vaguely unrealistic, until I realized what SimCity is actually about. At its heart, SimCity is about two things: 1) Acquiring residents; and 2) keeping the lives of those residents as comfortable and stress-free as possible. (Seriously -- the game would require you to take this to almost Wall-E levels of extremity).
[+] [-] ChrisNorstrom|14 years ago|reply
- Roundabouts
- Traffic Circles
- Shared Spaces (no separation between road and sidewalk)
- Light Rail
- Street Cars
- High Speed Rail
- Bus Stops that didn't take up a whole block space
- People Movers (like the one in Miami, FL)
- Bike Lanes / Bike Paths
- Bridging neighborhoods together with sidewalks
- Walk-able Plazas that residents would actually use instead of being lazy
- Small 2 lane highways
- Bridge control
- Better street control so that every intersection doesn't force cars to stop and go.
And why on earth did they claim the Mono-Rail was the fastest public transit and best for intercity connectivity?! Monorails are notoriously slow and terrible for anything other than amusement park transportation.
[+] [-] ginko|14 years ago|reply
The rigid separation of zones drove me nuts when I last played SimCity 4. Here in Vienna it's completely normal to have flats, shops and offices in every building. As far as I know this is even more extreme in Asian cities.
What I would love to see would be a triangle slider for zoning where you could for instance say this block should be 60% residential , 25% industrial and 15% commercial. Maybe some industries or commercial venues will require higher percentages to settle but this could also be an interesting tool.
[+] [-] smalter|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] NathanKP|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andyking|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] viraptor|14 years ago|reply
But then I had a crazy idea. Could we have a sim-city + transport tycoon in one massively-multiplayer game where people choose which variant they want to control? I'd pay lots of money for the possibility to play that. Imagine the situation where you actually have to look profitable to other players for them to invest in further development of your city by providing their services...
[+] [-] cahrens|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thetrendycyborg|14 years ago|reply
I'm far more excited by this then by another mindless space-marine-kills-aliens game.
[+] [-] philwelch|14 years ago|reply
I'm counting Football Manager over other sports games because in other sports games you actually control the players, whereas in Football Manager you only get to be the manager, and most of what you do in terms of buying and selling players, dealing with contracts, selecting players for a match, designing tactics and so forth are all classic sim-game stuff with lots of going through menu systems and toggling switches and moving sliders and none of the arcade stuff. Even matches you just sit there and watch (in abbreviated highlight form, or with an eye on match data), and occasionally make substitutions or tactical adjustments. If you didn't actually like soccer a great deal, you wouldn't really care; if you did, you might be willing to pay for new features and roster updates every year or two.
[+] [-] winthrowe|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ryanklee|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] binarycrusader|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] binarycrusader|14 years ago|reply
Instead, you have to dish out $80 for the "deluxe digital edition" which is of course only available on Origin.
[+] [-] ChrisNorstrom|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] runn1ng|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ilcavero|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] reefab|14 years ago|reply
Here is a screenshot of the page with the actual article content highlighted.
http://demenzia.net/shots/online_journalism_nowadays.png
On most screens, only the title is visible above the fold.
[+] [-] runn1ng|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] davidjhall|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adrianwaj|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ajpiano|14 years ago|reply
http://www.simcity.com/en_US/game/overview
[+] [-] ajpiano|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jcromartie|14 years ago|reply
What's up with this trend? It seems like it's happening with every movie, game, and TV franchise more than 10 years old.
[+] [-] freehunter|14 years ago|reply
To take an existing example, Star Trek (2009) is not a sequel or a prequel to Star Trek (1966-2008). It's a new piece of work rendering the old line as complete.
[+] [-] SimHacker|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] TylerE|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cahrens|14 years ago|reply
You would have players create families of Sims, where they would have full control over their individual Home and families, then add on the ability to get elected to a sort of community leader role with control over neighborhoods, then elected Mayor with full control over the entire city. Maybe even add Governers that have some power over collections of cities to for a state and wold be able to build certain infrastructure between cities. Maybe add another tier above that where a few selected players would be able to become Leaders of Nations and create laws and create national Infrastructure and the like. Of course in this system, all players are elected to positions, creating a sort of Sim Government kind of thing.
Theoretically such a game would appeal to a wide range of gamers, from the casual gamer just creating a couple Sim families to the hard-core gamer with being able to manage huge and complex societies amde up of other players.
[+] [-] pessimizer|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jack12|14 years ago|reply
It's an important point, whether the series is returning to it's roots of complexity from ten years ago, or if it will be a continuation of the franchise's modern-day releases. But the article leaves a very confusing impression.
I suppose they might mean to highlight this is the first SimCity game developed by Maxis themselves since 2003, but with Will Wright gone and 10 years of staff turnover, is there really much difference between a SimCity game being developed by "Maxis" instead of by any other outside developer?
[+] [-] thetrendycyborg|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] raarky|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thetrendycyborg|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tar|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] j45|14 years ago|reply
I was having a chat with a friend about Minecraft and how it's an "on ground" version of SimCity, at a much simpler level of building (literally) from the ground, out, and up.
[+] [-] aggarwalachal|14 years ago|reply
I would really like to make a swimming pool without a ladder and a sim swim in it, and watch it drown evil laugh on the ipad.
[+] [-] citricsquid|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] freehunter|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bane|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] verelo|14 years ago|reply
So long progress, relationships and work...hello lost hours and regrets.
[+] [-] georgieporgie|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cahrens|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Bapabooiee|14 years ago|reply
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/qmi0w/iama_maxis_devel...