Yes, like many others. That's why I upped the ante by stating "numeric and lowercase characters only". And with the glyph differences between them also create a "hidden" image.
Editted: What you reference to is a compiler and something completely different.
Both projects stem from the same root, TXT=EXE. However, both branch in totally different directions. One says "any printable goes" whereas the other says "only the smallest subset (preferably also for ASCII art) goes", mainly being being “0123456789acemnorsuvwxz”.
These are two different projects with different design goals and challenges. Tom's built a compiler around it, I created a bootloader that consists of only MUL and XOR.
I don't understand why I feel that I have to defend myself, I thought hackers love these kind of projects, yet it seems I got cancelled.
A true innovation would be to combine both projects. One that inputs source code plus an image and outputs ASCII art that runs like a program.
__s|2 years ago
pickledcods|2 years ago
These are two different projects with different design goals and challenges. Tom's built a compiler around it, I created a bootloader that consists of only MUL and XOR.
I don't understand why I feel that I have to defend myself, I thought hackers love these kind of projects, yet it seems I got cancelled.
A true innovation would be to combine both projects. One that inputs source code plus an image and outputs ASCII art that runs like a program.