(no title)
SQueeeeeL | 2 years ago
If pharmaceutical development was government run, I'd understand the outage at lowering the quality of life of US citizens; but faceless corporations literally cannot act in a way that is not financially optimal without committing a crime.
haswell|2 years ago
I think you found it:
> corporations literally cannot act in a way that is not financially optimal without committing a crime
The “problem” is that perverse incentives lead to unethical behavior that most would find distasteful and morally reprehensible.
I don’t understand the criteria for outrage that you’re hinting at. The fact that it’s not government run doesn’t make this less disturbing. It does change where one might direct their outrage.
jtode|2 years ago
Or someone who has drunk enough kool-aid that they actually believe that.
Both are pretty common here, this one seems pretty perfectly balanced between the two.
Georgelemental|2 years ago
The financial optimality of things depends in large part on government laws; changing the laws could re-align incentives.
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
COGlory|2 years ago
It's not quite that black and white.
alasarmas|2 years ago
As for crimes, in many cases, criminal behavior results in a fine that doesn’t make the behavior uneconomical. I’d like to say I don’t understand why this happens :-)
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]