top | item 36844557

(no title)

mediascreen | 2 years ago

And the counter argument that Dawkins himself he is an atheist because he was born in the UK in the 20th century just proves Dawkins point. I think Dawkins himself would agree that the likelihood of him being atheist would have been far lower if he would have been born in Pakistan or in 17th century England.

discuss

order

za3faran|2 years ago

The point he's making is that the fallacious argument can apply both ways, so it is not something that can be used to argue for either side.