top | item 36846313 (no title) spiffistan | 2 years ago Twitter has been rebranded as 'X'. Elon has the domain x.com and I suppose he wants to use it discuss order hn newest optimalsolver|2 years ago Is this like when that Roman emperor named his horse as a senator, or are we not quite there yet? bhaak|2 years ago The most sane interpretation is that Elon Musk was payed to dilute or destroy Twitter. I can't think of anything else that would make sense.Throwing 44 billion dollars on a company and then gutting it for everything that was valuable including a unique brand that had even its own verb?But the sad reality is probably that a 12 years old narcissist edgelord in the body of a billionaire wanted a vanity plate. load replies (5) paganel|2 years ago The US is already there, with an almost brain-dead 90-year old Senator being as good as gone, so that a privately-owned company doing whatever its largest owner thinks fit for the good of the company going forward doesn't even get close to that.
optimalsolver|2 years ago Is this like when that Roman emperor named his horse as a senator, or are we not quite there yet? bhaak|2 years ago The most sane interpretation is that Elon Musk was payed to dilute or destroy Twitter. I can't think of anything else that would make sense.Throwing 44 billion dollars on a company and then gutting it for everything that was valuable including a unique brand that had even its own verb?But the sad reality is probably that a 12 years old narcissist edgelord in the body of a billionaire wanted a vanity plate. load replies (5) paganel|2 years ago The US is already there, with an almost brain-dead 90-year old Senator being as good as gone, so that a privately-owned company doing whatever its largest owner thinks fit for the good of the company going forward doesn't even get close to that.
bhaak|2 years ago The most sane interpretation is that Elon Musk was payed to dilute or destroy Twitter. I can't think of anything else that would make sense.Throwing 44 billion dollars on a company and then gutting it for everything that was valuable including a unique brand that had even its own verb?But the sad reality is probably that a 12 years old narcissist edgelord in the body of a billionaire wanted a vanity plate. load replies (5)
paganel|2 years ago The US is already there, with an almost brain-dead 90-year old Senator being as good as gone, so that a privately-owned company doing whatever its largest owner thinks fit for the good of the company going forward doesn't even get close to that.
optimalsolver|2 years ago
bhaak|2 years ago
Throwing 44 billion dollars on a company and then gutting it for everything that was valuable including a unique brand that had even its own verb?
But the sad reality is probably that a 12 years old narcissist edgelord in the body of a billionaire wanted a vanity plate.
paganel|2 years ago