[WindyLakeReturn]

This feels like something that would, at large scale, be unhealthy for science as a whole. While existing papers have already gone through their own quality checks, this enables bad, misleading, or false statements to propagate which can end up being a blow to the credibility of the entire model. Shouldn't there be an ethical duty to due one's due diligence?

[square_usual]

To be honest, this is probably one of the less unhealthy common behaviours in academia :^)