(no title)
rm999 | 2 years ago
>Do not allow yourself to be confused: The Hot Big Bang almost certainly did not begin at the earliest moments of the universe. Some people refer to the Hot Big Bang as “The Big Bang”. Others refer to the Big Bang as including earlier times as well. This issue of terminology is discussed at the end of this article on Inflation [https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/relativity-...].
The article is talking about the "hot big bang", so it's using terminology that is accepted by other theoretical physicists.
https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/relativity-...
AuthorizedCust|2 years ago
It sounds like they feel the commonly accepted understanding of the Big Bang is overbroad. Fine. Find new words to describe the subsets of the event. Redefining the word is just causing confusion.
turndown|2 years ago
You are right that the goalposts have been moved. When analysis of the CMB began, it was noticed that it was far too uniform in distribution and temperature for what was previously thought to be possible. It was at this point that an inflationary period was tacked on before 'the big bang' because that was the only way to get the kind of 'big bang' we seem to have had.