(no title)
JauntyHatAngle | 2 years ago
I've moved a bit between different sizes and government vs startup vs mid-sized etc, and the titles vary wildly.
Some government jobs had people with 4 years experience be "senior" or even "tech leads" because they weren't paying enough so they simply promoted any bright spark that was going to last to senior roles so they could at least get a few more years out of them before they left, as HR wouldn't pay more money without them getting the a specific title.
Other place I've worked, your title was essentially a lottery system, others you were hard pressed to be a Senior without anything less than 10 years experience.
But each of those places, I encountered people with very specific ideas of exactly what a senior was, and they were convinced their own standards were the "accepted" ones.
There are definitely general guidelines for senior, associate etc, but they aren't normalised, just like you are saying.
So point is, in support of your post, you can't dismiss someone just based on the title they give themselves, as it might have been perfectly normal thing to call themselves in previous positions.
dkarl|2 years ago
rsynnott|2 years ago
user_named|2 years ago