top | item 36914691

(no title)

supernikio2 | 2 years ago

Yes, because China has double the population as the whole of Europe. Ceasing operations in the UK wouldn't hurt their revenue as much as doing so in China.

discuss

order

chongli|2 years ago

No, the population of China is not the issue. The problem for Apple is that so many of their products are still made in China that if they anger the Chinese government they risk having their factories closed, leaving them with no products to sell. To say this would be disastrous for sales would be an understatement.

llm_nerd|2 years ago

The last thing China is going to do is close manufacturing plants.

Apple makes 10x more selling in the Chinese market than they do in the United Kingdom, even with all of the roadblocks and handicaps China erects. Further Apple realizes that as the UK is a Western, democratic nation it is easy to essentially bargain about policies. Apple's current threats are essentially negotiating. There would be no negotiating with China about stuff like this.

peyton|2 years ago

Beijing can’t even shut down the factories north of the city that dump particulates into the lungs of the leadership and their families. No way they can shut down some of the big iPhone factories.

Alupis|2 years ago

So Apple's only principled if they'll make slightly less ludacris amounts of money?

It's really hard to be a credible "privacy/security" choice when your morals are plainly for sale...

function_seven|2 years ago

Nobody is talking about morals here. Its bad for business for Apple to capitulate to the UK. It's bad for business for them to not capitulate to China.

And iPhones ceasing to be sold in the UK would probably be all it takes for public backlash to neuter the law. I imagine that's not on the table in China.

wand3r|2 years ago

They have huge illiquid manufacturing in China. The government has a lot of leverage over them. Its impossible for them to gamble on this. It's not even comparable to the UK situation at all.

kergonath|2 years ago

A company has no morals… Its policies depend on the people within it, who do have all sorts of moral principles that are always more or less at odds with each other. Trying to go beyond that is a fool’s errand: a company is not a person. Everything makes sense once you’ve understood that.

When it happens, a company acting purely on someone’s moral code (usually a dictator CEO, though) sounds fine and reassuring. But on the contrary, this is unstable as you never know when that person will be sidelined, forced out, or realign their principles. At this point the company you trust can very well become an enemy. Just look at Twitter or Reddit.

On the long term, you need the company’s financial interests to be aligned with your (various) interests. This is the only thing that remains stable. Well, as long as nobody comes and make it private; then anything goes. It sucks, but that’s capitalism for you.

For the moment, Apple is mostly safe because basic privacy is their brand, and dropping it would be costly. This gives them leverage against some governments, but not so much against others. You can also count yourself lucky not to be born in China, but then there’s nothing Apple can do about that.

dividedbyzero|2 years ago

It's also important to draw red lines right away before unwelcome precedents are set. We'll do this for China and maybe for India if that market grows big enough, and we would absolutely do this in the US if compelled to, but we will not do this for anyone else. Except maybe for the EU.