top | item 36924506

(no title)

thegaulofthem | 2 years ago

That garbage piece of writing completely ignores nearly 80 years of conventional history which includes first-hand account from the very Japanese council cited in the story.

Absolute joke content that doesn’t belong on a site like this.

discuss

order

zeroCalories|2 years ago

The article is from a respected foreign policy site, and makes a case that is well accepted by historians. You can say that the bombs were still justified(which I believe), but the attitude in these comments are borderline insane. Makes you think americans can't handle a little criticism without losing their mind.

Etheryte|2 years ago

Would you mind pointing out what exactly is wrong in the article? Right now it isn't very clear what you take issue with. Most of what I've read about the surrender of Japan puts a lot of emphasis on the Soviet invasion, not only on the bombings, so I would be interested to know what you mean.

gre|2 years ago

What did the Japanese council say? Link me something to read!

Also, what do you mean by "a site like this?" Lmao