[bradenb]

My takeaway from this is that a lot of people disagree on what "edge" is. IMO, "edge" is the furthest resource that you have some computational level of control over. Could be a data center, could be a phone, could be an IoT device, could be a missile.

EDIT: I think I'm realizing people will disagree with me because I have a different perspective. For my use cases, my data comes from sensors on the edge, and so for me, I want my edge computing to be as close to those sensors as possible.

[paxys]

Not quite. Nearly every service out there has computational control over the end client (whether a mobile app, browser JS etc.), but very few are focused on edge compute at that level.

It is more helpful to think of it in terms of a traditional client-server architecture, where you want to move the server as close to the client as possible. This covers 95% of what people mean when they say edge compute.

[bradenb]

I do see your point, and I agree that covers most cases, but can it really be a definition if it doesn't cover all cases? Are just talking about a distinction between "edge" in an architecture vs "edge computing?"

[hahn-kev]

It's actually really helpful. Looking at a lot of js frameworks I thought I understood what they meant, but now I understand that the term is actually pretty ambiguous.

[weird-eye-issue]

That's a terrible "definition" of edge

[bradenb]

I'd love to hear a better one. Care to comment?