Women have embraced lots of activities which were exclusive only for men, but the girls also have now access to many activities which they don't embrace, they don't look forward to participate, they're not interested.
It's something similar to be fly assistant, which was an infancy dream - at some point - for many girls. At some point, it was opened to guys also, but very few kids have "being a fly assistant" as a dream. Most kids dream about being a pilot.
The reasons behind are not actually something you can change, not even in several generations, because "being a pilot" brings lots of masculine stuff appeal to the table, and "being a fly assistant" also brings lots of feminine stuff for girls.
So most girls end looking forward to the obviously most feminine profession, and most of the kids also want to be a pilot for the same reasons.
You can't change the reasons, hence you cannot "educate" boys and girls "for inclusion", and to want being a pilot and/or a fly assistant without having a positive prejudice in favor of the most masculine/feminine work.
Of course, you could modify the work environment of a male fly assistant to make it as cool like being dressed like Tony Stark. But if you do this, you probably make the role more appealing to males, and less appealing to females, hence you do break the "inclusion thing" here too.
I haven't mentioned yet that this "inclusion" thing is only Western thing, not the whole western included, just some stuff that is fashionable in some EU countries (not Eastern Europe, not much in Finland, Norway, Sweden), in the american continent just some cities in US, some in Canada, two or three countries in LATAM. Nothing else.
Most of Asia, Middle East, Africa, most of LATAM, Central America and most of US, do not share any intention of embracing anything remotely inclusive.
So, gender equality looks like it will never actually happen.
43235fsdfgsd|2 years ago
Women have embraced lots of activities which were exclusive only for men, but the girls also have now access to many activities which they don't embrace, they don't look forward to participate, they're not interested.
It's something similar to be fly assistant, which was an infancy dream - at some point - for many girls. At some point, it was opened to guys also, but very few kids have "being a fly assistant" as a dream. Most kids dream about being a pilot.
The reasons behind are not actually something you can change, not even in several generations, because "being a pilot" brings lots of masculine stuff appeal to the table, and "being a fly assistant" also brings lots of feminine stuff for girls.
So most girls end looking forward to the obviously most feminine profession, and most of the kids also want to be a pilot for the same reasons.
You can't change the reasons, hence you cannot "educate" boys and girls "for inclusion", and to want being a pilot and/or a fly assistant without having a positive prejudice in favor of the most masculine/feminine work.
Of course, you could modify the work environment of a male fly assistant to make it as cool like being dressed like Tony Stark. But if you do this, you probably make the role more appealing to males, and less appealing to females, hence you do break the "inclusion thing" here too.
I haven't mentioned yet that this "inclusion" thing is only Western thing, not the whole western included, just some stuff that is fashionable in some EU countries (not Eastern Europe, not much in Finland, Norway, Sweden), in the american continent just some cities in US, some in Canada, two or three countries in LATAM. Nothing else.
Most of Asia, Middle East, Africa, most of LATAM, Central America and most of US, do not share any intention of embracing anything remotely inclusive.
So, gender equality looks like it will never actually happen.