top | item 36960508

(no title)

tomalpha | 2 years ago

To be fair, a glance at her LinkedIn profile (top google search result for her name) suggests that 1969 could well be her birth year.

discuss

order

AdmiralAsshat|2 years ago

Totally unprofessional to be born in that year, IMO. She should have considered the long-term ramifications when deciding to emerge from the womb.

bloopernova|2 years ago

It's like the apocryphal 13th floor in hotels, people should be born in either 1968 or 1970. Otherwise I might make a fool of myself by mocking their username.

Same as anyone born on April 20th.

yjftsjthsd-h|2 years ago

In fairness, if I was born in 1969 I would be deeply torn between using it in every single username I had for the sake of comedy, or avoiding it precisely because people tend to make assumptions and actually being born then is never going to be anyone's first thought.

bloopernova|2 years ago

Ah, well not the first time I've made a fool of myself jumping to the wrong conclusion. I'll change the comment.

JoelMcCracken|2 years ago

I mean, nobody forced them to use their birth year in their username

silisili|2 years ago

Our of pure boredom, I can confirm records show this.

Clamchop|2 years ago

I'm looking forward to the Y2k69 hysteria.

qbrass|2 years ago

Where every username containing 69 has already been registered before anyone born in 2069 can use one?

bratgpttamer|2 years ago

A friend of mine was born on 6/9/69 and she made sure to tell everyone.