(no title)
beefok | 2 years ago
If you aren't allowed to question leadership and are instead expected to do "what you are told", then all the experiments and horrors studies on group think are a reality at a dangerous level [1][2][3] What if you think an order is dangerous and have good reasons why?
Good leadership needs to know what the ground-level knows, they need good input and questioning. Stalin killed anyone who opposed or questioned him, so all of the input and feedback was only positive feedback/intel to avoid being killed. Even when they were setting up one of the worst famines in recorded history [4].
Healthy societies aren't cults, and that is definitely a description of a cult.
I hate a Godwin-Law argument, but the damn Nazi's "did what they were told" [5], and those 'hard-working'-don't-question-leadership lemmings had a blind-eye to/assisted and/or murdered millions of people because they didn't have to deal with the burden of questioning and thinking for themselves. Fuck that.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment
[2] https://www.prisonexp.org/
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonestown#Deaths_in_Jonestown
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1930%E2%80%93...
[5] https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/how-the-nazis-defense-o...
lesuorac|2 years ago
beefok|2 years ago
We know what group-think does way beyond the experiment. We have a very well-documented history on it. Read Soviet and Nazi history, you'll see what it can do. It's almost universal in big groups of humans.
If a police officer told you to shoot another person, would you do it? If 3 police officers tell you to do it, would you do it? How many police officers will it take to make you shoot the person?