(no title)
angrais | 2 years ago
>> I also think it is becoming apparent that weight alone is not as useful of a metric as was once believed.
Being fat is bad for your health. That is a fact. No amount of body positivity advertisements will change that fact. It is healthier to be thinner than obese. Look at the graph above to see BMIs impact on other health outcomes.
Also, if you think the obesity crisis is fake/blown up then simply go outside in most American cities and you'll see that many people are obese.
> There is a subset of people who are being misidentified as unhealthy or overweight. Idk how large it is but it seems significant.
Again, this is not relevant as the subset of people is so small compared with the whole population.
The "data given" is included in BMI. Your relative weight is an indicator of multiple other health outcomes.
zolland|2 years ago
Then don't.
> if you think the obesity crisis is fake/blown up
I don't think obesity is fake or overblown. That's what the article was trying to argue.
I do however think BMI has its flaws and that those flaws are pretty significant when it comes to assessing individual health.
> Being fat is bad for your health... it is healthier to be thinner than obese
There is a healthy body fat % range but it is all very dependent on someone's activity and consumption.
Kirby64|2 years ago
The amount of body fat being detrimental doesn't change if you just exercise more or eat healthier. It's still bad by itself. You might have a better life expectancy than someone who is a sedentary lump at the same body fat, but that isn't saying much. Hence, again, BMI is a gut check. If you're at BMI=27, you almost certainly need to lose weight. Period.
robertlagrant|2 years ago
While this is not untrue, I don't understand why people single out BMI as a measure to criticise. No measure is perfect, or even particularly good in many cases, and yet it's BMI that gets it.