(no title)
tosser0001 | 2 years ago
https://twitter.com/RARohde/status/1685971656198545408
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/tonga-eruption-blasted-unpr...
tosser0001 | 2 years ago
https://twitter.com/RARohde/status/1685971656198545408
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/tonga-eruption-blasted-unpr...
espresso_enigma|2 years ago
IAmGraydon|2 years ago
Unfortunately, it also seems like a lot of people are hesitant to even discuss this possibility for fear of being ostracized by the mob.
mint2|2 years ago
This assessment is the same that a climate denier would make - it’s essentially climate gas lighting. Why do I say this?
Because the real reason it’s hard to discuss events with nuance is the highly vocal contingent of climate deniers that are looking for any single word or event that can be twisted to obfuscate the issue - first deny climate change, then to claim it’s not that bad etc etc.
That is the actual reason people are careful discussing climate, nothing to do with fear of ostracism. they’re rightly worried that the vocal anti-science people will twist their words.
The only people who fear getting ostracized are those doing the word twisting, the others are simply hesitant to give the Ron desantis types sounds bites to twist.
poutine|2 years ago
https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-low-sulphur-shippin...
rngname22|2 years ago
refulgentis|2 years ago
convolvatron|2 years ago
raverbashing|2 years ago
Also, the temperature anomalies seem to be close to the El Nino temperature changes (which is a big blob of hot water over the Pacific)
refulgentis|2 years ago
A much more compelling argument than your sibling arguing a mob is suppressing anonymous discussion lol.
marstall|2 years ago