top | item 37039717 (no title) m0ped | 2 years ago > One answer is to not have pedestrians. As the suburbs do.That's such and absurd suggestion I'm surprised you felt it worth writing, not to mention there are still plenty of pedestrians even in the suburbs. discuss order hn newest lockhouse|2 years ago It’s no more absurd than the suggestions in this thread that people only need small vehicles while ignoring the realities of why many people actually do need large vehicles. echelon|2 years ago > That's such and absurd suggestionIt's not absurd at all, which is why it's interesting to watch people who have never fathomed this try to come to grips with it.There is so much of this country completely unserved by sidewalks, busses, or cycling infrastructure. And it's fine. It works.
lockhouse|2 years ago It’s no more absurd than the suggestions in this thread that people only need small vehicles while ignoring the realities of why many people actually do need large vehicles.
echelon|2 years ago > That's such and absurd suggestionIt's not absurd at all, which is why it's interesting to watch people who have never fathomed this try to come to grips with it.There is so much of this country completely unserved by sidewalks, busses, or cycling infrastructure. And it's fine. It works.
lockhouse|2 years ago
echelon|2 years ago
It's not absurd at all, which is why it's interesting to watch people who have never fathomed this try to come to grips with it.
There is so much of this country completely unserved by sidewalks, busses, or cycling infrastructure. And it's fine. It works.