It's true that this is the fastest way to handle pagination, but it can really fast become too ugly to code, since you have to do that manually, instead of just specifying offset and limit and let the DB engine to it.
On the other hands, approach Google takes seems more sensible to me, if you have more that some maximum number of results, just refuse to paginate further. Instruct the user to narrow down his query criteria instead. What could be the use for "go to page 1235 / 5433" if not for some kind of crawling database content?
What? I've read through this site before (it's a great resource) and the whole thing is arranged out like a book. And like a good book, it has good flow from topic to topic that requires multiple pages of content.
I really don't think it is an advertising ploy, just a logic way to display long, structured content.
[+] [-] mrstinton|14 years ago|reply
On the other hands, approach Google takes seems more sensible to me, if you have more that some maximum number of results, just refuse to paginate further. Instruct the user to narrow down his query criteria instead. What could be the use for "go to page 1235 / 5433" if not for some kind of crawling database content?
[+] [-] PaulHoule|14 years ago|reply
Supporting sites like this starves quality sites.
[+] [-] polyfractal|14 years ago|reply
I really don't think it is an advertising ploy, just a logic way to display long, structured content.
[+] [-] fatalmind|14 years ago|reply
http://use-the-index-luke.com/book/export/html/12
[+] [-] danssig|14 years ago|reply