[arugulum]

But what would they be calling out?

If industry groups want to run a training run based on the configurations of a well-performing model, I don't see anything wrong with that. Now, if they were to claim that what they are doing is somehow "optimal", then there would be something to criticize.

[swyx]

poor choice of words, i probably mean sketching out the curves/doing ablation studies in a comprehensive way like the chinchilla paper did.

[arugulum]

Makes sense! But expensive...