top | item 37172685

CATL (Tesla Supplier) Launches Superfast Charging Battery (10 min)

22 points| Nazzareno | 2 years ago |catl.com

58 comments

order

friendzis|2 years ago

@dang, not only this heading is editorialized in a blatantly fanboyish manner, but there is absolutely no need to do so as CATL is literally the largest battery manufacturer and is supplier to almost everyone.

hef19898|2 years ago

At least people start to recognize that Tesla batteries actually are sourced from third parties, e.g. Panasonic and CATL. Baby steps.

j16sdiz|2 years ago

Why the "(Tesla Supplier)" remark, which is not in the original article?

CATL is the largest battery manufacturing company, supplying battery for almost every high-end devices.

tooltalk|2 years ago

>> CATL is the largest battery manufacturing company, supplying battery for almost every high-end devices.<<

CATL's primary product is NCM and followed by LFP. Their NCM development is more or less stalled at NCM811 while other leaders NCMs like LG (NCMA), SKI (NMCA) have moved out further. Also BYD's LFPs are known to be superior to CATL's for higher C-rates, faster charging, and safety.

boeingUH60|2 years ago

Founded in 2011. It’s mind-bending how they grew so fast..

prisoner3986|2 years ago

Because there is still the myth that Tesla has a secret sauce in their battery chemistry, and edge, and is not just using Pana, CATL and perhaps other vendor's cells?

ZeroGravitas|2 years ago

"Tesla supplier" aka "world’s largest battery manufacturing company" with about 1/3rd of all battery production.

hliyan|2 years ago

"Shenxing leverages the super electronic network cathode technology and fully nano-crystallized LFP cathode material to create a super-electronic network, which facilitates the extraction of lithium ions and the rapid response to charging signals."

Are these actual technical terms, or some sort of marketing speak?

tooltalk|2 years ago

Yeah, it's really nothing burger. I'm rather amused that they managed to sneak in Zeekr's 1000km range EV which ironically doesn't even use their LFP.

londons_explore|2 years ago

I suspect it is marketing speak that has been translated to english by a non-technical translator.

Flockster|2 years ago

But this is different from the 500Wh/kg Battery that was announced around 3 month ago right [0]?

Has something happened in this regard?

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35649935

jillesvangurp|2 years ago

Yes, different market segments. That one is aimed at the aviation industry where weight matters a lot and is worth a lot to customers.

LFP is technically a bit less energy dense than some other chemistries but it has cost as its big advantage which is why it is the go to choice for a lot of the mass produced mid range EVs. A cheap fast charging battery is going to be quite nice as it makes fast charging stops less disruptive. Which means the utility of EVs with smaller batteries increases. So what if you have to take a 10 minute break every few hundred miles? Not a big deal. You'd probably do that anyway if you value your health and sanity.

magnat|2 years ago

> super electronic network cathode

> fully nano-crystallized LFP cathode material

> second-generation fast ion ring technology

> superconducting electrolyte formula

Can someone confirm those are proper names of some recent breakthroughs in LiFePO4 manufacturing or just some marketing technobabble?

myrmidon|2 years ago

Mostly marketing technobabble I'd say.

If CATL had a roomtemperature superconducting electrolyte you'd know ;)

Probably exacerbated by internal/non-common terminology and maybe questionable translation.

josu|2 years ago

I found the concept of Grice's Maxims the other day, and it feels very relevant. Everyone is getting triggered because this fails the maxim of relation.

>Grice's four maxims of conversation, called the Gricean maxims—quantity, quality, relation, and manner.

>Be relevant — i.e., one should ensure that all the information they provide is relevant to the current exchange; therefore omitting any irrelevant information.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_principle

beardyw|2 years ago

There seems to be no indication of the power demands of charging at this rate. I don't have the figures to do the maths but I suspect a normal household supply could not support this. Anyone?

donny2018|2 years ago

I'm not an engineer but I attempted to do some napkin math in my comment in a previous topic about this CATL battery. I'll copy/paste:

Assuming 400km worth of charge needs maybe 60 kw/h of energy, to deliver that amount of energy in 10 minutes would require at least 360kw charger. Charging just a few cars simultaneously will require megawatts of power. I wonder what are the implications in terms of city infrastructure or investment costs to building charging stations for that.

jgilias|2 years ago

But you don’t need to have a 10 minute charger at home. At home overnight charging is completely fine.

londons_explore|2 years ago

It could not.

However, a household supply could supply substantially more with smarter software. Specifically, currently we rate power supplies with a decent safety margin for worst-case conditions.

However, your '100 amp' power supply can probably supply 200 amps on a freezing cold day (which helps keep cables cool). It can probably supply more than rated if your neighbours aren't using much (since your and your neighbours power connections may share cables).

If you or your neighbours have rooftop solar, thats power going the other direction, which cancels out some power use - allowing you to charge even faster.

If software could take these factors into account, we could get a lot more power to where it needs to be. Currently rules don't allow such things though.

ifdefdebug|2 years ago

Probably not, but does it matter? When parking at home, your car usually is a few hours at rest anyway. This is interesting for charging at a service station.

rkangel|2 years ago

They say 4C and a Model 3 battery pack is apparently 60kWh so that would be 240kW. That's ignoring inefficiency though, so we're talking significant fractions of a megawatt to charge one car.

ngrilly|2 years ago

Great, but how large and heavy is the battery? The announcement doesn't say anything about the energy density.

solidr53|2 years ago

Exactly what I was thinking. They mention 700km as some reference point, then 400km in 10 minutes, not sure what the density is.

Hyundai/Kia launched the EV6 with 10-80% charging in 17 minutes more than two years ago.

They then launched Hyundai IONIQ 6 with 10-80% at the 16 minute mark.

I guess we will be seeing 10-80% times get close to gas pump refill times in the near future.

bestouff|2 years ago

I hereby officially launch a new verb: I'm short on charge, I'll shenx my car for 10 minutes and I'm coming.

You heard it first on HN.

nunez|2 years ago

What are the chances that the new Model 3 coming out is using this?

jacquesm|2 years ago

What does 'superconducting electrolyte' even mean?

seydor|2 years ago

more china dependence