top | item 37182043

Wedding Photographer Spent a Year in Jail After Pleading the Fifth

47 points| jakobdabo | 2 years ago |petapixel.com

47 comments

order

ethanbond|2 years ago

The guy happened to be a photographer, but his being subpoenaed and held in contempt had to do with him refusing to testify against his corrupt DEA brother. He “pled the Fifth” to avoid, in his own words, testifying against his brother, which is not what the 5th Amendment protects. His lawyer claimed he was pleading the 5th to prevent accidentally perjuring himself, but there’s no such thing as accidentally perjuring oneself. Prosecutors have to prove you willfully and knowingly told a falsehood.

This is just someone paying the cost they have to pay to protect their criminal brother.

Seems like due process working well AFAICT.

redeeman|2 years ago

> Prosecutors have to prove you willfully and knowingly told a falsehood.

No, they have to make someone else believe you did. How else would this burden of proof be lifted? some form of brain scan that can just say "yeah, he willfully did it!"? no, they put fourth some motive/set of circumstances, and if a bunch of people believe the spin, its "proved"

more_corn|2 years ago

Wait, you’re saying incarceration someone for 18 months without charges or trial is somehow alright?

No. Not alright.

If you think it’s fine I encourage you to go through it. Oh you’re not interested in spending 18mo in jail? Then STFU.

wmil|2 years ago

> It is worth noting that the DOJ defines perjury as a declarant “willfully” making a false statement, that the declarant believed that what they were saying was untrue, and that the statement was related to a material fact. Misremembering a detail is not, in and of itself, perjury.

The prosecutors and judges have a lot of leeway with assuming "willfully". Plenty of people have been convicted because a prosecutor wanted to apply pressure / make an example and choose to believe an incorrect date was a willful lie.

simple-thoughts|2 years ago

Something about this smells like a bad attorney. Especially the part where he didn’t know that he was free until his card stopped working. But who knows, and it doesn’t matter anyway since the legitimacy of the court system is supposed to rely on common ideas of justice rather than process. If all we have from courts is process, it’s no longer justice, only bureaucratic oppression.

sinuhe69|2 years ago

If not the 5A, on what can one use to refuse to testify in court? The law can not compel you to help the government investigate somebody, right?

HWR_14|2 years ago

The standard other exemptions are doctor-patient, attorney-client, religious leader-religious person, and spousal confidentiality laws. Some, but not all, states also shield journalist's sources. In the last case, in states without a shield law, going to jail to protect a source's identity is considered a professional honor.

jvanderbot|2 years ago

Oh I believe they can. Isn't it called a supoena?

l0wp1t|2 years ago

They can compell you testify if they offer you immunity.

hgsgm|2 years ago

Clickbait headline.

Weddinga and photography have no relations to the substance of the article.

imwillofficial|2 years ago

This is a loop hole that is often exploited to punish people without the application of due process.

Terrible.

fatfingerd|2 years ago

He doesn't have the right to plead the 5th to avoid testifying against anyone but himself or his spouse, so his attempts to plead the 5th were just nonsense. Making an issue now seems to me like the "justice" connected criminals he was protecting by his contempt are somehow more worthy of rights than everyone they have used this tool on.

singleshot_|2 years ago

When you say loophole, do you mean the fact you have no 5A right against self incrimination once you are grAnted immunity? Or something else?

NoZebra120vClip|2 years ago

Held in a psych ward too, huh. I wonder what variety of insanity he was guilty of.

I wonder how many comrades were found insane after January 6th.