top | item 371965

How car dealers tie Detroit's hands

45 points| sethg | 17 years ago |newyorker.com | reply

18 comments

order
[+] jbarciauskas|17 years ago|reply
Isn't this exactly what bankruptcy is for? Put GM in a pre-packaged bankruptcy (http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/prepackagedbankruptcy.as...), and one of the planned actions should be shedding these unprofitable brands and severing the relationship with these dealers. The dealers made a bad bet on a brand, they are entitled to nothing.
[+] razzmataz|17 years ago|reply
> severing the relationship with these dealers.

That's actually hard to do - there's a myriad of state and federal laws that make this all but impossible. It cost about a billion dollars for GM to deep six the oldsmobile brand, buying out old dealers franchises, etc...

[+] gamble|17 years ago|reply
I've never really seen the appeal of franchising. You get a packaged business, but then the franchiser has you by the balls forever. Plus what I've read suggests that most franchise owners barely eke out a profit. Car dealers are probably better off, since they have service revenue independent of the parent company, but they're still dependent on a single supplier.
[+] briansmith|17 years ago|reply
"McDonald's exemplifies the role of small businesses in Americans' upward mobility. The company is largely a confederation of small businesses: 85 percent of its U.S. restaurants -- average annual sales, $2.2 million -- are owned by franchisees. McDonald's has made more millionaires, and especially black and Hispanic millionaires, than any other economic entity ever, anywhere."

-- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12...

[+] dws|17 years ago|reply
This article parrots Detroit's "take what you're given at shut up" view. Dealers see things differently. My family ran two automobile dealerships. The one that dealt with Detroit (Ford) had little choice in what they were given to sell, and complained in particular of Detroit shoving lots of big cars and trucks at them when the demand was for a size or two smaller.
[+] blackguardx|17 years ago|reply
Why don't they just stop making Buicks? Or are they obligated to provide a certain number per month?
[+] vaksel|17 years ago|reply
a billion to kill a brand that costs you money is not that bad. It costs them something like 1-2 billion to bring a car from concept to production, so they'll save that money the first time they avoid having to redesign a new model.

But why kill? Sell it off...you are going to lose all that value anyways, so even if you sell Buick below market price, you still make more than if you just close the doors

[+] hugh|17 years ago|reply
To put that "billion dollars" in perspective, General Motors' current burn rate is apparently $6.9 billion a month. Ouch!
[+] jcl|17 years ago|reply
Don't Honda and Toyota have the same problem? They seem to be coping.
[+] sethg|17 years ago|reply
Honda and Toyota aren't wishing they could shed unprofitable brands.